Why did terrorists endorse Bush in 2004 and will they endorse another Republican in 2008?

Question

FOX NEWS EXCLUSIVE
The statement tells American voters that Abu Hafs al-Masri supports the re-election campaign of President Bush: "We are very keen that Bush does not lose the upcoming elections." The statement said Abu Hafs al-Masri needs what it called Bush's "idiocy and religious fanaticism" because they would "wake up" the Islamic world.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,114489,00.html

------

MORE TERRORISTS FOR BUSH
Al Quaeda group officially backs Bush
"The statement said it supported U.S. President George W. Bush in his reelection campaign, and would prefer him to win in November rather than the Democratic candidate John Kerry, as it was not possible to find a leader "more foolish than you (Bush), who deals with matters by force rather than with wisdom."

In comments addressed to Bush, the group said:

"Kerry will kill our nation while it sleeps because he and the Democrats have the cunning to embellish blasphemy and present it to the Arab and Muslim nation as civilisation."

"Because of this we desire you (Bush) to be elected."
http://in.news.yahoo.com/040317/137/2c226.html

SECULARS FOR KERRY, FUNDIES FOR BUSH
The most pro-Kerry, he said, are the former Saddam Hussein loyalists — Ba'ath Party members and others who think Washington might scale back its ambitions for Iraq if Mr. Kerry wins, allowing them to re-enter civic life.
The most pro-Bush, he said, are the foreign extremists. "They prefer Bush, because he's a provocative figure, and the more they can push people to the extreme, the better for their case."
http://www.washtimes.com/world/20041027-121030-7792r.htm

Answer 1

Well that's fairly obvious. Ever heard of reverse psychology?
As the majority of the US population will tend to do exactly the opposite of what the terrorists want them to do they would of course say they support Bush so that the American people might actually listen to them and vote for the guy they really want in office.

Answer 2

You assume that because of the fact he ran for workplace interior the 70's he replaced right into a "chief" of the Libertarian stream in 2004, and keeps to be one at present, that's an extremely large assumption. George McGovern ran in that comparable Presidential race, did you communicate him to be a frontrunner of the Democratic party in 2004? What approximately Jimmy Carter, is he a modern chief of the Democratic party? additionally, i think of evaluating the TEA party to the Libertarians is very a stretch. i comprehend very very few TEA party applicants and supporters who help gay Marriage, Marijuana legalization, and finished withdrawl of foreign places wars; all significant tenents of the Libertarian party. The TEA party and the Libertarian party are nowhere close to to being the comparable. i might by no skill, in a million years, evaluate "TEA party favorites" like Christine O'Donnel, Sarah Palin, Michel Bachman, or Rick Santorum to be libertarians. All are stressful-middle social conservatives.

Answer 3

Yes, stop embarrassing yourself.

Everyone knows that the Terrorists Support Democrats.
And Democrats Support Terrorists.

Terrorists/Democrats --- Samey, Samey.

Answer 4

Ah, yes, Travolta_Stinks2: giving a new meaning to the phrase, "Smoking the peace pipe" since 2007....

Answer 5

I am sure we can count on you to keep us informed of who the terrorist choice for US President is.

Answer 6

He doesn't count, Osama supports the democrats LOL

Answer 7

Wow... this isn't even a spin... it's a train wreck, do you need help cleaning this up small man?

Answer 8

Are you from Minnesota? lmao

Answer 9

Let the conspiracy theories spew forth