The democrat party. Leaders of communist, terrorist and hateful countries support them - why?

Question

Living in America and having some of the most wicked, diabolical and degenerate Leaders in each of their own Countries support "Me" (ie: "Me" being a democrat Presidential candidate) in the Democrat Party...

I MUST be doing something right huh?

OR

Are they supporting me because they know I'm soft and they'll walk all over me, kill my people, terrorize my citizens, sink my ships, shoot down my planes, bomb my buildings... Sooooo much easier if I were say... Elected President.

Curious minds want to know!

univee - Brainwashed? Reading how those leaders support democrats is being brainwashed? lmao

Well Tinker Bell, I've been voting ever since 1980.

whiteflame55 - Seeing as I'm so dumb how come you have 5 thumbs down? (Mine will be #6 because you called me a name and thus 'flamed me.'

You're perfect blocking material but I'lllet is slide for now. Nor will I report you... Yet.

Henry VIII - It's a funny thing that you brought up Hitler's quote from Mein Kampf.

So who's shouting the loudest in Congress? Who keeps repeating themselves?
Who keeps dreaming up the most far-fetched and hurtful verbal blasts against our military?

The Republicans? I THINK NOT.

univee - tsk tsk... Please use capital letters when addressing me as Peter Pan!

Gets out calculator for Tinker Bell... 1980 minus 18 yrs of age (legal voting age) = 1962

Answer 1

I think it's the second scenario. I listened to Osama bin Laden deriding the dems with the same degree of disappointment that Cindy Sheehan has...that we haven't surrendered in Iraq yet.

Answer 2

Your kidding right? The democratic party Communists? ya right. the democrats are about one centimeter (on the line of liberal to conservative) to liberal. they are both crap one changes the plan slightly. And yes they would get walked over but didn't the Republicans? They still haven't got out of Iraq. 9/11 what was that? wasn't that getting walked over? Still they haven't found the Taliban. Wow that' s some great leader he's been able to terrorize more people, get his own people killed, and rise the terror level on his own people in 2 terms! You gotta give him props. And guess what. Its worse if the democrats do get elected (better 4 the republicans) because then they can say "hey we took down Sadam, they are the ones that got elected and couldn't finish it." So can we get walked on more? Yes, the Republicans say because most the deaths were in Iraq. If we hadn't attacked the deaths would be here, now isn't that bad? Its like what this man said "The republicans say government sucks, get voted into office and prove it!" Now how could the democrats be worse not that i want the to win. personally i think we need a big change. The economic classes are getting to far apart, and this worthless Presidents. We need some change for the better heck I would even vote for a socialist at this point.

Answer 3

That Hitler preferred the Republicans to the Democrats was well known at the time, and some stupid people used that to make the GOP into the Antichrist. They were ignorant then, and you are now. What possible differnce does it make who Osama likes?

Kruschev endorsed John F Kennedy, and Nixon used that as a cheap campaign tool, but it was Kennedy who won the Cold War by backing the Soviets down during the Cuban missile crisis. I bet Charles Manson has a preference, too. Maybe we should find out what every nut case and looney thinks.

Answer 4

Actually, if you go back to the last presidential election (2004), pretty much the entire world outside of the US wanted Kerry to win. That included most of the world's reasonable people. Poll after poll in numerous countries showed that to be the case. So it was not just those "diabolical" people you refer to, unless of course, the rest of the world is "diabolical."

Think about it. Al Qaeda has benefitted greatly by Bush's decision to open up another front in Iraq, and the terrorist organization has also benefitted from the significant drop in prestige and power suffered by the US as a result of the Iraq War. The terrorists would love nothing more that to have more of the same after 2008

Answer 5

The (d) celebration is closer to communism than (R) are with they're liking of socialized medicine and bigger government. "A hen in each pot" Lamp 212: "because of the fact any non-egocentric guy or woman with a million/2 a strategies helps the democrats" I continually concept there grow to be something incorrect with them, now all of us know. DEMOCRATS HAVE in user-friendly terms a million/2 A strategies!

Answer 6

I don't support Chavez, but even I had to laugh when the guy had the balls to insult Bush like that in front of the world.

Believe it or not, the answer is C) none of the above.

Oh hell, the right versus the left argument is getting so old. Neither side is pure evil, and neither side is pure good. Get it through your stupid heads!

Answer 7

Scared to death to talk REAL issues there are some who prefer to make unfounded personal attacks on political candidates. It is the Rove thing where they try to frame the campaign or the debate their way by making outrageous claims. They believe as did Josef Goebbels, Propaganda Minsiter for Hitler's Third Reich who said that if a lie is big enough and is told many times by people of some importance the public will believe it to be true. When the lie is revealed one simply tries to discredit the revealer or make him dissapear never to be seen again.

Answer 8

This is because they hate Bush. Chavez called him the devil from the podium at the U.N. conference. They don't want anybody like Bush in office again. Can't you see how the Bush administration has disrupted a large portion of the world? Caused militarization of many countries? Is reigniting the cold war with Russia. Do you think this is a good thing? I'm voting democrat. Maybe they can get things settled down. I don't want my grandchildren to have to face WW III just to prove how tough GW is.

Answer 9

Well, if they know you're listening, wouldn't they tell you to elect them, knowing you don't like them, so that you wouldn't elect them?

i.e....
Communist/terrorist/hateful folk: Hmm, I don't want a Democratic President of the USA. I know the people of USA don't like me. So, I will say I want a Dem Pres because then, they won't vote for them! Bwahahaha!

Answer 10

Ok, beautiful choices there Einstein, I'm sure your mother would be proud. Here's the issue. The reason they support Democrats is because they see that party as being the only one that's willing to extricate us from the war in the middle east. That means they wont have to fight us anymore and waste more of their time killing people. You act like after we leave, all of a sudden there's going to be a massive influx of terrorists into our country. Why would they do that when we've already shown them we're willing to give them back their sovereignty? Let me guess, Islamic radicals, right? If it is just Islamic radicalism, how does staying there help? Are we putting down a massive amount of them and forcing them into hiding by attacking one country?
Oh, and I'm sure if the terrorists had a choice, they'd much rather be the ones wiht the planes, ships, and missiles than the ones who have to suicide bomb locations.
Funny, you think 7 thumbs down make me doubt my own point, but I back it up with some actual evidence. Where's yours? Oh, and I don't know how anything I said can be listed as "flaming" - what I said at the top questions why you would only provide 2 possibilities at all.