English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am writing an essay for history and need some outside infromation....heres the question...

What were the major arguments used by each side (the supporters and the opponents) in the debates over the ratification of the U.S Constitution?

I already have that the supporters were called federalists, and that they wanted a strong national government, and that the opposers were called the anti-federalists, and that they were afraid of strong national government would weaken powers of the states governments and take away the rights of the people. Any other infromation is greatly appreciated, thankyou for your help :P :)

2007-09-19 09:47:54 · 4 answers · asked by chica85542 1 in Education & Reference Homework Help

I am talking about ratifying the constitution like in 1788, not now...that wont help me.

2007-09-19 09:54:46 · update #1

4 answers

Try these sites.

And that a govvernment of the people by the people and for the people shall not perish.

2007-09-19 10:02:50 · answer #1 · answered by Will 4 · 0 0

You have good information so far.

The Federalists:

Favored ratification of the Constitution

Favored a strong central government

Argued that a Bill of Rights was not needed as federal power was limited

The Federalist Papers


The Anti-Federalists:

Opposed ratification of the Constitution

Wanted a weak federal government that would not threaten states rights

Wanted a Bill of Rights to declare and to protect the rights of the people

Ratification:

Federalists promise addition of a Bill of Rights

Ratification succeeded, new government formed 1789
James Madison drafts 13 amendments to the Constitution ten are accepted and become the Bill of Rights

2007-09-19 10:06:26 · answer #2 · answered by DrIG 7 · 0 0

Salam Urdu language is a break of of Arabic its simular in a sense, but not Arabic. To be Ulima you need to study religion on all fronts and then dive hard into your Quran and al Tefseer of Islam. This has nothing to do with Urdu. I don't really understand the question other than to tell you those who are guided will be and continue to be guided by Allah, and there is a balance after you have learned. I have met reverts that speak nothing but english and read nothing but english and they are much more learned than any urdu or arabic person I have ever met. The translation came for a reason in 1927. The passion in a revert is greater than any muslim born person I have ever met.

2016-05-18 21:36:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Do not what to call them. There are issues that need to changed.
For example by the constitution if you are born in the USA you are automatically a citizen. Yet our forefathers did not know that in 2007 9.3 of all births were to illegal aliens.

2007-09-19 09:53:30 · answer #4 · answered by fin73 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers