I would not only vote for them, I would use my personal time to pound the pavement campaigning for them!
Those two gentlemen are independent thinkers and listen to their consciences and their constituents more than the political parties, the media and special interest groups.
2007-09-19 08:31:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by ItsJustMe 7
·
3⤊
4⤋
Mc Cain a moderate? Since when? The Bull Moose was the symbol of the PROGRESSIVE Party started and headed by T. Roosevelt because Taft was too conservative. The results of the 1912 election saw Democrat Woodrow Wilson win the election followed by Progressive Theodore Rooseveld and in a distant third was Republican William H. Taft. Actually the closest Republican we have in the current race to the Progressive T.R. is Giuliani. That said even Giuliani doesn't come close to T.R. in integrity and abilities just that Rudy is the most progressive candidate the Republicans have in this race.
2007-09-19 08:39:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
no longer till the two considered one of them have been professional-existence. McCain has already stated he might employ conservative justices. i'm no longer so specific he might, yet i comprehend abomo does no longer. Lieberman is a liberal. i do no longer think of he might, the two. I merely isn't vote casting for McCain as much as i may well be vote casting against the abominable abomo. i think of i visit probably vote, although. yet once you do no longer, I completely comprehend.
2016-10-09 11:44:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by henze 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I couldn't vote for McCain because he was pushing amnesty so hard. They are not moderate but rather extreme in their belief of nation building.
How would either of them creat strong business and economy? That is bs. The government can't create a strong economy only a truly free market WITHOUT government interference can create a strong economy. Our government has been meddling in the marketplace too much and in healthcare etc... The best way to fight terrorism is with the constitutional tool of Marque and Reprisal, rather than going into sovereign nations and telling them they have to do what we want them to.
2007-09-19 08:38:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Beauty&Brains 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
So two people that NEITHER side likes is a good pick?
Honestly, I am not convinced one bit that either candidate would do what you claim they would. Based on what evidence? Based on what programs? How will they pay for this? You don't give us the plan, and I know why. Neither of these guys HAS a plan. They're all moderate in talk, but they are pretty much nothing in action.
2007-09-19 08:34:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mr. Taco 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
no never...sorry but I disagree with Lieberman, and seriously do not trust McCain on anything
2007-09-19 13:32:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by VodkaTonic 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO. I don't see McCain as being strong against terrorism and he tries to hard to get along with the likes of Ted kennedy and Finegold. That McCain-Finegold campaign reform bill was a joke.
2007-09-19 08:31:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
I agree 100%.
McCain is my first ticket if not then Guliani
2007-09-19 08:30:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Con4Life 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
I could vote for Lieberman---------I don't trust McCain.
2007-09-19 08:29:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Yes I would. Go McCain!
2007-09-19 08:30:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 6
·
3⤊
4⤋