Lets think about this.
He reduced intelligence spending!
He never responded appropriately to Saddam and his on going weapons program!
He appointed the head of the CIA at the time of the 2003 invasion! George Tenant who provided the case for war!
Why didn't we see this before? Was this his plan all along?
2007-09-19 07:13:52 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Wait this is a conspiracy theory on the same level as Bush lied so we would go to war. Why are you people resisting this lie?
2007-09-19 07:21:00 · update #1
Clinton?
Mastermind?! lol!
2007-09-19 07:19:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
As the moral conscience assigned to the WH since Reagan, trust that Clinton's involvement in Iraq was far more diplomatic than his predessor. Maybe you're not old enough to know that it was 'Daddy Bush' who regarded the first invasion because of the oil appetite & republican greed and unscrupulous ethics. Remember if you can, the Iraqis surrendered in droves. That in itself didn't demonstrate aggression, on their part.
Baby Bush wants to settle the score for his daddy's missteps; for whom both of them were warned about their 'aggressions' for the wrong reasons. Oh that would make them 'transgressions' wouldn't it. If you are religious, you would know what that means; just as you would if you're spiritual. I just know for a fact, when it comes to spiritualism, most Westerners have failed to connect!!!
They claim to have 'faith' what they really have is 'belief'. The faith they claim is only because of my existence here in the states. Unlike the riots of the '60's and that level of thinking, I don't appreciate wrecking my homeland. Instead, I'm utilized as a bargaining chip, because I do have 'faith' and the ALMIGHTY has backed my will & wishes. They have no problem with exploiting this or anything/anybody else to further their cause. However, unlike them I believe and have faith that is now demonstrating (look around you), that 'what goes around, comes around'. And it has always been my prayer to see those kind, get their due!!!!
THE 12th MESSENGER
2007-09-19 08:03:45 · answer #2 · answered by hecate669isis 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are making a case for the war in Afghanistan. The war in Iraq was a personal initiative from Bush and Cheney.
The biggest lie of all is to believe that if Bin Laden was dead that 9/11 would not happen. These are radical islamist not radical bin ladist. This is a religious war for them.
2007-09-19 07:23:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Look a little further back ... at former head of the CIA and former president Bush sr. and his ties to the middle east
most people with common sense knew as soon as Bush jr. cock-blocked the 2000 election in FL that we would soon be involved in the middle east ... if anything Clinton's tenure slowed the Bush's ideological war crimes
but blame who you like, all roads lead to Rome ... but that doesn't change that all this has happened on republican watch ... and poor leadership and the lack of critical decision making has made things worse ... 10 fold
2007-09-19 07:22:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Let's see President Bush has been out of office for nearly 7 years, and you Neocons are still blaming him for Bush failures.
Why stop at the Iraq War?
Why not blame him for the Assasinations of JFK, RFK, Malcolm X and Dr. King?
Why not blame him for Regan getting shot?
Why not blame him for bad weather?
You Neocons need a reality check, and you will get one during the election of 2008.
2007-09-19 07:30:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
He was more of a ignorant mind than a mastermind. His terrorist policy was to ignore the problem and hope it went away. He too stated how Iraq was a threat to the U.S. But his biggest blunder was not getting Osama when he had several chances to do so. Without 9/11 there would not have been an Iraq war.
2007-09-19 07:23:12 · answer #6 · answered by meathead 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Will you people get over trying to blame Clinton for everything. It was GWB's decision to have a war in Iraq. If anything you should blame George Bush Senior.
2007-09-19 07:21:21 · answer #7 · answered by Liberal City 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bill was the mastermind behind the famous War on Aspirin. It was his greatest achievement, other than setting the record for the most rapes committed by a public official outside of the Kennedy Clan.
2007-09-19 07:18:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Well we know that George Bush is dummer than a box of hammers, and is thus extremely easy to manipulate...so maybe Clinton was just manipulating Bush from afar.
2007-09-19 07:21:16 · answer #9 · answered by Whoops, is this your spleeen? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mastermind is perhaps not the word.His lack of state of mind and concern for a nation in my opinion led US to war. But, yes he was responsible for events and his lack of self control that left America unprotected. He also had numerous opportunities during the Gulf War and some security info to remove Bin Laden he missed. He may just have set it in motion expecting it to present Hillary in eight years as a savior and place him back in the White House. Nothing is beyond their range of deception.
Yes, you may be right. Thank you.
2007-09-19 07:21:06 · answer #10 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Hey, Kevw25. I could not let that one go. Bush 1 didnt finish the job becuase every dem and liberal of that day got on tv and warned him to not go beyond the terms set out by the UN. Get your facts straight before you bash former Pres of US. I am so sick and tired of idiots on here!
(Look what happens when we abide by the UN decisions. Especially when we are the only ones who are expected to )
2007-09-19 07:22:20 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋