Would a 57 megaton nuclear bomb,be enough to take the fire out of IRAN?

Question

just one bomb,,droped by isreal on them?57 megoton,that cracks about 35 miles wide,just for the crater,

yes pnac,,but is one not enough,,I think maybee its a 50 mile wide crater,lol,,,thats just the crater,,my god,,I don,t want the dust in white house,,,,,lol,,,haaaa,,just one,,they can even buy it from russia...haaa

mr nice gut,,dude the world has tested 1,000 + nuclear bombs over the years,,WE STILL HERE,,,,the crater with a 57 megoton bomnd i think exceeds 35 miles,,can drop from a airplane,its not a new thing,,,,put on the radiation suit and dance into the fire ,,,haaaaaa,,,,,lol,,,,problem solved & oil safe under ground.

sorry friends I can,t give any thumbs up ,my button is not working at my new low level...F.P

short bus my friend team war ,,is true,,TRINITY AND BEYOUND,,THE ATOMIC BOMB TEST,,the vidio ,,I have the vidio,,,the vidio shows a chinese DANCE INTO THE FIRE,china nuc bomb test>and all the rest the whole deal,,35 mile crater from a 57 megotom yield,dust cloud to 100,000 feet,,the bombs the world has are more than enough to chock/burn us all.thats a fact...the movie haaa was funny,,the music,the chinese fire dance,lol,,haaa

Answer 1

Two would be better. Islamo Fascists must not get nukes! They must be defreated by the forces of Good - GWB!

Answer 2

The approach you cited is like clumsy boxing. I want to suggest an alternative which is more like kung fu.

For 21 years, Chicago was run by Mayor Richard J. Daley. He had a heavy handed approach. For the1968 Democratic National Convention (DNC), Daley "was not about to let his city host the unraveling of the Democratic party by unruly protesters." To this end, in addition to his 12,000 police officers, whom he put on 12 hour shifts for the convention, he also called in 7.500 US Army troops and 6,000 national guardsmen. For the week of the convention, Daley had a bigger army than had General Washington.

Daley did become the center of attention as a result of the convention, however, not in the way he had hoped. During the convention, Daley's police force clubbed and maced not only "unruly protesters," but also members of the press, clergymen, women, old, young, and anyone else who was within swinging distance.

All those demonstrators got priceless sympathy. They were portrayed as victims, even though the majority were indeed intent on completely disrupting the 1968 DNC. Henceforth, protesters were always given the benefit of the doubt, and any attempts to control them were described as fascist attempts to control free speech.

Compare this to the more clever approach of his son, who is now mayor of Chicago. When there are protests, the police act like baby sitters. They simply cordon off the area and the protestors can't get any sympathy about police brutality. Since the protesting is tediously boring, the press doesn't even cover it.

The protestors sometimes try and pick a fight with the policemen, but they won't take the bait. The protestors hate the fact they have no police injustice to rail against. They want the attention a clash with police would bring, but the police are too clever now.

Which approach is superior?

This is the choice we have with Iran. If we squash their illegal attempts at getting nukes, they will have the sympathy of the entire Arab and Persian world. The result would be like creating a 24-hour a day factory for new terrorists to avenge the Iranians.

Anyone who uses a nuke immediately loses the huge advantage of "moral superiority". Ideas can change the world faster and more permanently than heavy-handed war. Remember, when George Washington was fighting the British, what kept the troops motivated was the compelling idea that they were doing something noble.

What would devastate the grip of intolerant Iranian mullahs who want nukes is not war but ridicule. About six years ago, a satellite tv station in Los Angeles was broadcasting to the Persian (Iranian) and Arab audience there. A technical fluke caused the signal to bounce half way around the world, where it was picked up in (you guessed it !).... Iran.

The Iranians started laughing at the previously revered ayatollahs. Their mystique was broken by seeing how ludicrous and out of date these bearded relics really were. Almost overnight, Iranians started thinking differently about the role of Islam ruling their lives. This is how to fight a war: with ideas!

Just like the old expression "the pen is mightier than the sword", in the modern world, a satellite tv station sure handles the job also.

Answer 3

Israel won't use a nuclear weapon. jointly as the destruction could be in the main in Iran, the fallout could holiday reckoning on which way the wind improve into blowing. because of the fact the U. S. is presently stationed on the two factors of Iran, we could be affected by ability of the quite a few fallout. that could desire to propose Israel won't use nukes - because of the fact they might't danger pissing the U. S. off. Plus, in the event that they nuke Iran, it may be puzzling for Haliburten to get in and get the oil out. i'm sorry if that did no longer answer your question, yet a nuclear attack won't be an selection.

Answer 4

Good thinking. I think the Russians and the Chinese might be a little concerned about fall out and their backyard glowing for the next million years or so. The devastation of nuclear weapons isn't just the big poof they make when they go off, it will be all the environmental damage that will take more than a millenia to dissapate. And if we do irratdiate Iran, how will we buy thier oil?
News Flash genius, blowing things up only causes more problems.

Answer 5

People like you really make me ashamed to be American. There's nothing noble or positive about using nuclear weapons. I bet you are pro-life as well..which would explain why you would applaud the millions of innocient Iranians that would be vaporized in such an attack.

Typical hypocrite.

Answer 6

Majority of Iranian's are good people
Like many Muslim nations the Crazy fringe takes control

Let france and Isreal deal with them.

Answer 7

Yes, probably, but are you ready to eat the radioactive fallout that such a bomb would send worldwide? I'm not.

Answer 8

YEAH, wack 'em -- Tony Saprano \ Scarface 2012 - road to the White House baby

If we can't have that oil, NOBODY CAN!!!


And if anybody dares talk trash -- dey get wacked too

Dat's da way ta run da world sweetheart - reign-a terror

Answer 9

Yes.

Answer 10

Probably not. It would just cause more people in the world to hate us.