Now, before you go labeling me, I'm chastising both sides of the aisle, as an INDEPENDENT. (not to mention that come next Sep/Nov, it'll be my vote you're after)
Legislation being pushed in Congress has historical precendence in costing the lives of tens of thousands: civilian and military. In the interest of proving they are "doing something," these politicians are going to get people killed. Regardless of your party, take a look at the historical results and demand that your party set aside partisan politics and vote for the national interests, national security and protection of civilians and troops.
War on Terror Blog©2007, http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-DfkctJU7dK5B7LcNROoyVQ--?cq=1
2007-09-19
05:33:06
·
9 answers
·
asked by
John T
6
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
SoP: What polls? I don't see any polls quoted here.
The role of politicians in war is to determine a national threat, a national interest and the political goals to be achieved by placing our men in harm's way.
It is the role of Generals to figure out what tools and units they need to achieve the goals laid out by those politicians.
Oversight? Yes, they then have the responsibility to determine if the General is succeeding or failing and whether that is because of political interference (refusing to provide the tools needed or tying the hands of the military) or incompetence.
It is not in the interest of "oversight" that politicians tell Generals that the enemy can not be engaged until Soldiers or Civilians have been killed.
If the General says he needs more troops to do the job, then it is the politicians job to determine whether or not that means increasing the authorized size of the military.
Equipment should be bought based on needs not constituency.
2007-09-19
06:01:08 ·
update #1