English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

29 answers

just another example of the many things that don't add up regarding the actions of the McCs.........a very interesting question, have a star x

2007-09-19 03:50:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 9 6

actually no ! but do i believe it, again no, for a start think about it no one stores dirty nappies in a car or tranfers them to another place that is ..... what's the word oh iv'e got it ludicrus . well thats the word they.ve been using for ages. plus if we are led to believe that the bodily fluids were sufficiant enough to seep throug the carpet into the wheel well they had to be pretty dam sodden anyone who has changed a nappy knows that they are built to hold water. i have changed nappies on several occasions and on only one of these occasions did the nappy become so sodden that it broke down and disintergrated you could not pick it up it was every where . so if their nappies were like that i would be asking some serious questions about how they look after their children because if the nappies were that bad its a case of neglect plus if you were for some unknown reason of insanity wante to put dirty nappies in a car you would put them into another bag or container not next to clothing etc . all i can say they must be pretty dirty people and also responible of neglect of their two other children . so much for being responsible parents

2007-09-19 04:39:59 · answer #2 · answered by angel 1 · 3 2

actual no ! yet do i think it, lower back no, for a start up think of approximately it no person shops grimy nappies in a vehicle or tranfers them to a various place it particularly is ..... what's the observe oh iv'e have been given it ludicrus . nicely thats the observe they.ve been utilising for a while. plus if we are brought about have self belief that the actual fluids have been sufficiant sufficient to seep throug the carpet into the wheel nicely they had to be tremendously dam sodden every physique who has replaced a nappy is attentive to that they are outfitted to hold water. I even have replaced nappies on numerous activities and on basically a style of activities did the nappy boost into so sodden that it broke down and disintergrated you ought to no longer p.c.. it up it grew to become into each the place . so if their nappies have been like that i may be asking some severe questions approximately how they look after their babies because of the fact if the nappies have been that undesirable its a case of ignore plus in case you have been for some unknown reason of insanity wante to place grimy nappies in a vehicle you may positioned them into yet another bag or field no longer next to outfits and so on . all i will say they might desire to be tremendously grimy human beings and additionally responible of ignore of their 2 different babies . plenty for being to blame parents

2016-10-05 00:10:50 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Neither the Portuguese police nor the McCanns are allowed to talk, so all we have are rumors and stories by newspapers, professional liars.

My instinct tells me the McCanns are only guilty of child neglect and nothing else. But if there is a case against them they will be brought to trial and we shall finally have all the answers. For the time being, let us keep an open mind.

2007-09-19 04:46:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

Excellent question. The cuddle cat had the scent of death on it and the nappies story is a load of codswallop invented by the McCanns legal team.

2007-09-19 04:45:10 · answer #5 · answered by trancebabe 4 · 4 3

because she's a freak? or because she didn't actually put dirty nappies in the car. The DNA will prove her innocence though, obviously. Because if it is the twins DNA then it doesnt mean anything at all.

Do they look like the sort of people who would stick dirty nappies in the car. I've done it when we've been out and about but I never hid them under the spare wheel. Perhaps I'm odd.

2007-09-19 03:51:43 · answer #6 · answered by snaffle 4 · 7 5

Exactly and straight to the point, and why the nappies weren't mentioned before? and the amount of hair (not by transfer 88% match with Madeleine) belong to the twins as well?
Star

Edit:
yahooyah... stop atacking the portuguese police when they are backed up with the british police and judges with experience in case you don't know there are laws to protect your personel belongings they had to go trough the procedure they take the cuddle cat if they were charged but they weren't people just think that because they got an expensive PR and expensive Lawyer.

2007-09-19 03:49:38 · answer #7 · answered by Tim 4 · 8 6

ROFLMAO!! I think it's because they didn't keep dirty nappies in the car.

2007-09-19 04:04:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Now THERE'S a good bloody question!! Sorry Lady Penelope, I can't explain it - but Geez! Clatty bi tch!!

2007-09-20 02:23:36 · answer #9 · answered by Tamayah 3 · 0 1

Good point. I think they took the nappies to stop police analysing them, if that actually happened on a conscious level. I would never have washed cuddle cat though unless it was really minging.

2007-09-19 03:49:22 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 9 6

Maybe some folks live in a just plain disgusting way. They reckon that Harold Shipman's house was a pigsty, so being a doctor is no guarantee of hygiene. Wash the toy to look good for the cameras. What can't be seen - shove under the rug ( or in the boot)

2007-09-19 03:52:29 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4 7

fedest.com, questions and answers