Proof of cooperation between Iran and Syria in the proliferation and development of weapons of mass destruction was brought to light Monday in Jane's Defence Weekly, which reported that dozens of Iranian engineers and 15 Syrian officers were killed in a July 23 accident in Syria.
Syrian and Iranian Presidents, Bashar Assad, and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, listen to national anthems at the Ash-Shaeb presidential palace in Damascus, Thursday.
Photo: AP
RELATED
Analysis: There's a reason world is quiet on alleged IAF strike
J'lem downplays Iranian threat; Olmert: I respect Assad
According to the report, cited by Channel 10, the joint Syrian-Iranian team was attempting to mount a chemical warhead on a Scud missile when the explosion occurred, spreading lethal chemical agents, including sarin nerve gas.
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1189411428847&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
2007-09-19 02:00:15 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
So nonzionist: attaching sarin gas to a missle is simply being proactive in expanding their power and influence? LOL
2007-09-19 02:19:11 · update #1
The only people who will claim this are the anti-Semite & hate-America Leftists. Iran and Syria's history of death and destruction in the name of Allah is well recorded.
In addition to the 'chemical warhead on a Scud missile when the explosion occurred, spreading lethal chemical agents, including sarin nerve gas' many are speculating that nukes were involved. North Korea is being implicated.
2007-09-19 02:03:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Neither is peaceful. Both are seeking to become a "world power" at the expense of the free world.
2007-09-19 02:06:11 · answer #2 · answered by rduke88 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Just curious, are other countries allowed to be proactive in expanding their power and influence? Or just the USA and our CIA mob.
-
Don't we tip our missiles and bombs with uranium? What about our mini-nukes? Sometimes countries saber rattle to convince predatory countries from attacking. Ironically, it might be the fact that Iran HAS nukes that keep us from attacking.
2007-09-19 02:14:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
nicely, i've got not seen Iran invading different sovereign countries unprovoked, implementing their way of government upon others whether or no longer they choose it or no longer, abducting different nationalities and torturing them and preserving them incommunicado for years. short answer: definite.
2016-11-05 21:49:58 · answer #4 · answered by laubersheimer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they are blood brothers. and possibly egypt. obvious if the war spreads, the "brotherhood? will include the others.
2007-09-19 02:05:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe they're peaceful at all and I also don't believe that Islam is a "religion of peace."
2007-09-19 02:03:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Peaceful, can we say no??!!!!!!!!
2007-09-19 02:08:29 · answer #7 · answered by kim t 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋