What will happen if we only had our instinct without knowledge?

Question

Like children they don't know whats wrong or right.
Or primitive people have only idea but no knowledge..

Would our instinct knows what is wrong or right?

Answer 1

This kind of permission to act without any cognisant or intellectual deliberation is possible in humans being - in animals, however, instincts are the only means possible. Our instinctual actions and functions use the lower part of our brain called medulla that connects higher brain to our spine, it is also called reptilian brain, as it controls all our instinctual functions relating to, for instance, sex, huger, comfort and survival.

Now what would happen if we lose the human brain to live only with our reptilian brain? I could not imagine what it would be like to be absolutely spontaneous. Would it have been sufficient for us to live on instincts and by never developing personal, social and intellectual capacities?

The question here delves deeper into the origin of life in human form. The question is – did life originate from matter or does it have some divine origin, or an origin that is transcendental and not merely physical. For if life is all manifestation of physical super-arrangement of atoms and molecules then we would have required to develop any more then the rest of the animal species. But life is considered to have some kind of link to something supremely real then the endless human quest for excellence, or search for things better and better, can be explained; that we are still upon the course of our evolution, and if physically we are matured we need to go much further mentally; it is just like a journey.

In this sense our instinctual mind, and its instrument our reptilian brain, and all our instincts are but our physical requirements, whereas in essence, in some other dimension of really we might not feel any need to be instinctive; we might live as pure knowledge, complete understanding, or as an embodiment of love for our Creator. We might in fact be aliens not only on the Earth but also into this universe altogether.

Answer 2

1

Answer 3

Like knowledge and learning, instinct is barely understood and, certainly, the boundaries are analogous to a water with alcohol mixture. The old stereotypes of animals behaving strictly on instinct don't hold anymore. Our vaunted brains mostly react on a gut-gonad basis, and the point where concept disappears along the evolution-revolution tree is also not known.
There is no observed basis for such a speculation.

Answer 4

Our instincts don't know what right or wrong they know how to live in balance with nature. Animals which are almost all instinct will very rarely kjill one another in a show of dominance. Say when two dominant wolves enter into a physical struggle over being pack leader. the "losing" wolf upon realizing he's "lost" will expose his jugular in a show of defeat and the "winner" will NOT rip the "loser" jugular out of his neck. We humans will tend to kill the loser. both figuratively and literally.

Answer 5

Instinct does not know right or wrong, instinct only know how to survive. So if we did not have knowledge, we wouldn't know how to reason. We will be living just like animals.

Answer 6

Animals have powerful instincts, but they have no logic, knowledge. If we would had only our instincts... well we would be back in the stone age. Knowledge is more important then instinct - for me anyway.

Answer 7

Instinct is knowledge. Instinct comes from what millions of years of evolutionalknowledge that is programmed into our genes an subconcious mind.

Answer 8

Technically, no, they ought to no longer have the skill to do a DNA attempt with out your wisdom and consent, and that i'm especially helpful it does no longer be legally admissible in courtroom, because of the sneaky nature of how they went approximately it, if certainly that's what they did. At any fee, you recognize who the father it. So no concerns there. permit it bypass. whether, you ever heard the asserting "as quickly as bitten, two times shy"? What it means for this reason, is that in case you have been naive sufficient to drop your infant off with human beings you rather know and now suspect they did something sneaky in the back of your back on a similar time as that they had him, then you have been bitten and with any luck you will extra beneficial careful they next time they ask for something extraordinary. in case you won't be able to have confidence them, do no longer bypass away your newborn on my own with them. in case you do bypass away him with them, ensure you get many info and a telephone extensive type so which you will randomly call them and discover out the place they're. Be shy... be careful. And in the event that they get mad at being asked questions, then do no longer supply them your newborn whether you're worried that it could reason complicated emotions. finally, you are the only one to guard your newborn. As mom and dad themselves, they ought to appreciate, and in the event that they do no longer... nicely, to no longer be advise yet their newborn ended up in detention center. so as that they are no longer likely interior the area to place in writing any parenting classes.

Answer 9

Well,its obvious,we would want then,to be alive,food,shelter,and water.But,it depends without knowledge,that would be too stupid!there would have to be some kind of knowledge and learning,otherwise we would waist away.

Answer 10

life would be less troublesome. Knowledge is great, but somebody always does wrong with it that outshines the right with it.