English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

people actually said this.harrington has to be one of the worst to ever play qb in the nfl.he is only still in the league because he was a high draft pick.he should be holding a clipboard some where.or bagging groceries.

2007-09-19 01:10:50 · 20 answers · asked by mojo569 4 in Sports Football (American)

20 answers

The people that were saying that Harrington was a better QB are people that "hate" Vick. They hated him before the whole dog fighting thing. Once all Vick's allegations became public their hatred became worse and they had a ligament reason to "hate" him other than just, "well he runs too much" blah blah. Although most of the allegations were not his indictments and he only got charged with a fraction of what everyone of those people wanted.
But they were only talking junk because they didn't like Vick in the first place. Anyone who actually thinks Joey Harrington is a better quarterback than Michael Vick wears a helmet in his everyday life or doesn't know football from ping-pong.

2007-09-19 01:55:36 · answer #1 · answered by tonydgr8 5 · 1 2

Harrington is not a better QB than Vick. With a weak Offensive Line the Falcons need a mobile QB in the pocket. Vick provides mobility, while Harrington doesn't.

2007-09-19 01:43:06 · answer #2 · answered by Tony R 5 · 0 0

Harrington has to be one of the worst to ever play qb? Wow. You really like to showcase your ignorance, I see. There are over 100 quarterbacks on rosters in the league today and even more free agents. Harrington is one of 30 of them that has a starting gig(although Leftwich will probably replace him by midseason). So by my calculation, there are at least 70 qbs in the NFL right now that are worse than him.


And yeah, Vick was better. But he was an idiot and threw it all away. I wouldn't hire Vick to be a greeter at Walmart when he gets out, he's too simple-minded.

2007-09-19 01:28:30 · answer #3 · answered by Edub 4 · 0 0

I believe the poster who says that Harrington is the greater advantageous quarterback pondering he can play NOW. i do no longer comprehend that lots approximately Joey Harrington, as i'm no longer a Lions fan nor a Miami fan. genuine, his win/losses checklist is definitely dismal, yet I even have heard there replaced into lots controversy surrounding the Lions while he replaced into QB there, and maximum of it replaced into by using protests against the CEO, Millen. difficult to have a useful season while even your place of birth followers are against the gang, by using fact the Falcons will detect in the event that they even evaluate putting Michael Vick back on their roster. it additionally must be pronounced that pondering the hype and salary of Michael Vick, he hasn't produced lots in the win/loss branch for Atlanta the two. confident, he replaced into thrilling to video exhibit, yet he fumbled lots greater advantageous than any QB would desire to. i think of Michael Vick replaced into continually notably over rated. i replaced into partial to his nevertheless, yet under no circumstances returned. If the question have been who's the greater advantageous person, i'd desire to for particular answer Harrington. I heard an interview with him on ESPN activities radio, and he's very staggering. None of that third guy or woman crap, and he particularly seems to be the form of guy which will under no circumstances taint the acceptance of the NFL. sturdy success Joey, this Falcons fan is rooting for YOU!!

2016-12-26 17:58:10 · answer #4 · answered by rusher 4 · 0 0

As a Ravens fan, I have seen my share of bad and I mean just plain awful QB's and Harrington is no where near worst then most of the guys Ravens fans have had to suffer watching. But he is a career backup and he will never be anything more. To think that he would, is silly to say the least.

2007-09-19 02:15:09 · answer #5 · answered by MJMGrand 6 · 1 0

I've never, ever heard or read that comment. People don't think Harrington is better than Vick. They both suck.

Harington is a bust, and Vick was a glorified punt returner who would rather smoke weed, play Xbox, and murder dogs with his "biz-oys" than to learn the playbook and study film.

Michael Vick is a complete waste of DNA. Harrington may suck, but I give him credit for making the effort. That's more than Vick did in all his time here in Atlanta.

2007-09-19 01:15:58 · answer #6 · answered by Deke 5 · 2 1

I never thought that Harrington, the ex-Lion quarterback was better than Vick, but we won't see Vick anytime soon, if ever again. Get over it, you got Byron Leftwich coming to Atlanta, but Atlanta needs an offensive line more than a quarterback.

2007-09-19 01:20:37 · answer #7 · answered by graciouswolfe 5 · 1 0

The secret is out on Harrington- he can't play. However, the only people who thought he could play were NFL GM's. Fans have known this for the last several years. His days of starting in the NFL are over.

2007-09-19 01:19:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Harrington is a bust plain & simple.
I agree with you that the only reason he's still in the league is because he was a high draft pick.

Harrington, Rick Mirer, Tim Couch (before he was FINALLY released) all got to hang around because they were high draft picks.

2007-09-19 01:43:33 · answer #9 · answered by mr_cj_jr 6 · 0 0

that's something i never ever heard before. if someone actually said that they need to slapped across the face with a wet fish and wake up. harrington isn't all that great of a QB to be honest and should be the backup QB not a starter...ever.

2007-09-19 03:17:17 · answer #10 · answered by storeetjdjay 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers