Wouldn't Hillary Care be coercive and centralized?
2007-09-19 01:07:46 · 9 answers · asked by Moody Red 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
You would probably have better coverage if you don't work, after all that is the group she panders to.
It certainly would be coercive, you will have to pay more if you smoke or are fat because of your unhealthy lifestyle. But if you are a drug abuser and don't have any money, you will get the best for free.
Years ago, my father had a stroke and had to go in a nursing home. My brother and I went to the local medicaid office to get him assistance. He had worked his entire life and paid taxes all that time. The person we spoke to was very derisive and almost abusive, the very idea that they should pay for his nursing home. While we were there a drug abuser, whose continued drug abuse had destroyed his kidneys, came in and they fell all over themselves begging him to go to the dialysis center right away. This young man had probably never worked a day in his life and probably stole to support his drug habit. Such is the attitude of Liberals.
2007-09-19 02:38:36 · answer #1 · answered by plezurgui 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The whole point of Hillary Care is to be coercive and centralized. Unless healthy young adults are made to buy health insurance and therefore subsidize the less healthy and older of us her system can not begin to work. Remember in Hillary's view we all need to be told what to do by people just like her(it takes a village). We don't have the ability to live our lives without elitists direction. Fortunately it is still a long way off until the 08 election, and the more people get to know Hillary the less they tend to like her
2007-09-19 09:01:18 · answer #2 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely! Hillary, along with the rest of the libs, will never realize that the solution to everything isn't more government! Example: In the past, Hillary has gone on record saying that children in families should have as much right to decide important family matters as parents. She even went so far as to say that family disputes should be decided by judges in courts! Anyone looking for a solution to ANYTHING from Hillary will be greatly disappointed.
2007-09-19 09:03:22 · answer #3 · answered by rduke88 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If you like socialism, you'll love Hillary and her plan which will give the government strong control of a major piece of our economy. Do you want the government to expand its control over your life while promising you more entitlements? Have you ever known a government agency that runs any function more efficiently than the private sector? Do you think that her projected figures even scratch the surface?
There is no citizen in the USA that is turned away from treatment because of lack of insurance!
The scariest words in our language are: "Hello. I'm from the government, and I want to help you."..
2007-09-19 10:15:36 · answer #4 · answered by DrB 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Care is just one more Marxist scheme coming from the EXTREME Left.
If you don't follow the Communistic leading of move-on-dot-org, you can't get the nomination for President under a Democratic ticket.
2007-09-19 10:34:35 · answer #5 · answered by Philip H 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Care? What a crock. I prefer CHOICES in my doctors and not having to wait MONTHS for medical treatment.
Just look at England and Canada. They're both starting to re-privatize the health care industry because people DEMAND treatment NOW and are willing to pay for it.
2007-09-19 08:16:10 · answer #6 · answered by Roland'sMommy 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
She will make the taxes like they were before the great depression about 92% for any one making over $12,000 and we will not be working than. So it would be mute as we wait in long food lines and not gas lines.
2007-09-19 11:31:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
no and having health ins. should not be dependant on having a job. look how many people have jobs that have no health care. If your employer decides what benefits you get do you really think it is your choice
2007-09-19 08:11:54 · answer #8 · answered by bungee 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
The problem is not everyone can pay for it. The rich say, "Oh, we will have to wait months like in Canada to see a doctor." But the truth is, Canadian wait times to consult a doctor are very short, unless one is seeing a less common specialist. It is fear tactics. The rich like to say things like "people will pay for it." because they can, and if helping others causes them to miss a bit of golf, damn the rest!
2007-09-19 08:20:24 · answer #9 · answered by jjrousseau 2 · 0⤊ 5⤋