2007-09-18 23:39:15 · 11 answers · asked by Jaycal 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
No, i think the DNC are sandbagging...
2007-09-18 23:43:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Barack Obama will win the primary and succeed in the General Election - whereas Hillary is toast and she knows it. Will she sit down today and disappear, NO, she likes the money in her campaign fund too much, of which she will find a way to squander before she gives it back.
The DNC knows by way of certain campaign contributions who they should be backing, and none of those contributions have been contributed to Hillary, so they are being quiet until after the primary. Not out of fear, they are probably hoping Hillary disappears quietly and dignified when that other candidate takes the election. And safe, it is fair to say they are pleased that the election is in February, indeed.
2007-09-19 07:02:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Looks like Clinton right now, but its way too early to say, remember 2004, at this time in 2003 everyone was convinced it would be Dean, possibly Gephardt, or Clark, it turned out that just in the last 3 weeks before the Iowa caucuses Kerry and Edwards pulled ahead and it ended up being between them, with Kerry eventually winning the primaries
2007-09-19 06:47:38 · answer #3 · answered by secretservice 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is still no choice although the front runners are Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know who will likely win.
2007-09-19 06:47:29 · answer #4 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. candidates usually arent elected until the election.
2007-09-19 07:25:23 · answer #5 · answered by Avatar_defender_of_the_light 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If they pick either of those two the dem party is DOOMED again to fail fail fail..
The Hilla-beast is the worst choice. Barack is no better for their cause at this time.
Fred Thompson he's Your man, if he cant do it no one can.. yeh yeh cheer
2007-09-19 06:53:33 · answer #6 · answered by IHATETHEEUSKI 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They probably have BUT if they were smart, which they ain't, they would stay away from both. You know damn well that the good ol' USA is not ready for either a woman or a black. We got to wait another couple of hundred years for that.
2007-09-19 06:47:27 · answer #7 · answered by emiliosailez 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, but looks like they want the most radical candidate available, and that is Clinton.
2007-09-19 06:45:29 · answer #8 · answered by WC 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Looks like it is Barak http://www.whowouldtheworldelect.com/
2007-09-19 08:18:10 · answer #9 · answered by KD7ONE 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
why don,t a women
2007-09-19 06:47:58 · answer #10 · answered by keral 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋