2007-09-18 20:49:18 · 17 answers · asked by ffan 1 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
wwe is the best
2007-09-18 20:57:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
A lot of people are immediately going to answer "WWE" because they're fans of the company.
The better company depends on what you're looking for.
For wrestlers, TNA is becoming a better option because the schedule isn't nearly as bad as the WWE schedule. TNA guys only work 3 days a month and make pretty good money.
For people like Angle, Lita, Christian, RVD, Jericho, Big Show, etc who don't want to spend 200 days a year on the road away from family, TNA is a better company.
For young guys who dream about making it to the the big leagues, then the WWE is a better company.
2007-09-19 06:20:34 · answer #2 · answered by Jack 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE has better looking stars, hotter Divas and great commentators....Even though some TNA matches are more violent, WWE superstars perform better....Not only that but some of the stars of TNA are WWE rejects
2007-09-19 05:44:08 · answer #3 · answered by jslhot8 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE is the better company. Why? Because at least with the WWE they don't give all the titles to one person, or take cheap shots at the opposing company. All the stuff going on with Kipp and James in TNA saying that they were the "original" DX and that it was their idea was BS because the DX idea was Vince McMahons. Not Triple H's, Not Shawn Michaels, Vince's. I don't think TNA is a very MATURE company. They spend TOO much time taking cheap shots at the WWE and quite frankly, it got boring, so I stopped watching...
2007-09-19 04:07:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
here's the problem with tna. their wcw jr. come out of the gate hot with great young talent, and then they go and get the old stuck in their ways has been wrestlers and let the younger talent just be mid carders. only thing their doing is building their brand so that when they are big enough and a small threat to the wwe they'll get bought out. they had the right idea with the 6 sided ring, and the young fresh talent. but when your paying pac man jones 25,000 a night just to get the shock factor, that's taking away from what you were building.
2007-09-23 02:22:53 · answer #5 · answered by outlawtmh 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely WWE.
2007-09-19 07:13:29 · answer #6 · answered by brittany 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wwe 4 sure
2007-09-19 03:59:50 · answer #7 · answered by Bass_Junkie 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
TNA by far FOR ME!.Have you seen the matches they put on they are awesome.TNA's talent is a lot better than WWE's(in my opinion)because they've got Christopher Daniels,AJ Styles,Sting,Kurt Angle,Judas Mesias,The Steiner Brothers,Abyss,Samoa Joe,Rhino AND A LOT MORE.
2007-09-19 05:01:49 · answer #8 · answered by COB RULE 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
WWE..
but i must admit that i was a die hard fan a couple years back while it was still WWF.. not sure why, but in the last few years I've lost interest.. the story lines just aren't as entertaining as they used to be and the current wrestlers just aren't the showmen that 'Stone Cold' - 'The Rock' - 'Man Kind' - etc - etc - etc used to be.. shame!!
i do still watch it, and never miss an episode but just not what it used to be!!
2007-09-19 04:31:49 · answer #9 · answered by Toni K 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
WWE is better because it's been in company for more than twenty years.
2007-09-19 03:52:33 · answer #10 · answered by Darkskinnyboy 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋