could it be possible that modifiers of certain subject realy proves that such modifiers are existing because?

Question

existence primarily entails something that which may not a part of such modifiers but it proves such thing existed ,as true modifiers because it become a part of it .But how come that modifiers must have to pass first the latice of categories befor it come to be as right modifiers so for example
of the subject itself?
a can may not be a can itsef without someting that make such a can other than the machine that makes it ,let say a fish with out such fish the can may not be calle a can if the meaning of can inthe dictionary is "synonym to container"

corrections

the word "of the subject itself" is the continuance of the question

Answer 1

A container, by definition, has the ability to contain. It does not have to contain anything to be a container. It only has to have the ability to contain something. The container does not need to have any proof that it was created to be a container. It only has to perform it's function according to it's definition.

You're complicating something that doesn't have to be complected.

Answer 2

Dewd........... Whatever you've been smokin'...... I *do* hope you brought enough to share.

Doug

Answer 3

What?! Oh, never mind.

Answer 4

could be

Answer 5

dude, we are humans.