English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Anybody knows where I can find a simplified proof of Minkowski inequality?

2007-09-18 19:12:52 · 2 answers · asked by earsanddrums 1 in Science & Mathematics Mathematics

2 answers

Wiki has an outline at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_inequality

Doug

2007-09-18 19:21:59 · answer #1 · answered by doug_donaghue 7 · 1 0

component to clairification. Is time and distance measured with comprehend to the deliver, or an observer on element C ? (C seems to be the suited decision) (And if time is measured with comprehend to the element C, an exception applies in determining the value of the 2d tachyon which you state is wrt the deliver) ********* No, i'm no longer as smart as Einstein and Pythagorean blended, or one after the other, so i'm going to in basic terms answer the question the way i choose to. First, the deliver is hitting a element is area and time. permit's undertake the deliver's reference physique and presume time is in accordance with it. The thrilling factor is that the element, no longer the deliver, is now shifting. Pod a million hits the element H in 3 years, its time. t.a million = t.s ? (a million-(v1)^2) t.a million = 3 yrs. t.s = 3 yrs/? (a million-(v1)^2) Pod 2 hits the element H in a million 3 hundred and sixty 5 days its time. It launches at a million 3 hundred and sixty 5 days deliver's time. t.2 = (t.s -a million) ? (a million-(v2)^2) t.s = a million 3 hundred and sixty 5 days/? (a million-(v2)^2) +a million remedy for v1 on the subject of v2 t.s = a million 3 hundred and sixty 5 days/? (a million-(v2)^2) +a million = 3 yrs/? (a million-(v1)^2) ........... gotta run, i'm going to end this when I come back.

2016-12-26 17:47:45 · answer #2 · answered by lammons 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers