English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.ocala.com/article/20070917/APA/709170948

2007-09-18 19:01:40 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

i hope they lock him up and throw away the key...sex with a 5 year old is beyond disgusting
.

2007-09-18 19:11:05 · update #1

6 answers

Because this prosecutor was not pursuing investigations involving the bush administration.

Yes, another Republican caught! Only this guy is a sick bastard who will hopefully spend the rest of his life in jail.

Unlike Craig, there is no defending this guy. Although I am sure there are a few republicans out there that will defend him.

2007-09-18 19:19:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Gen Stigo, on an identical time because it would be protocol for a President to interchange all federal attorneys while he enters the placement of President it does no longer mean he has to do it that very minute. He has the wonderful and ability to interchange them as he see's in high-quality condition. while they take their place the comprehend that they serve on the posh of the President and could be replaced at any time, there's no activity secure practices. So each and every time the President gets a wild hair in his butt he can hearth all of them or a number of them or only one in all them, its his top. Now for dave's respone he has it backwards, you are able to hearth all and sundry for any reason in an "at will state" no longer in a "top to paintings state". In Tennessee, an at will state, they'd hearth you for donning blue to paintings sooner or later and you haven't any longer any recourse. Now by using fact the federal government isn't a state they are actually not decrease than the comparable state rules. once you paintings in Federal positions you paintings on the privilege of the President. something that is federally funded isn't a promise to have activity secure practices by using fact there's no promise the investment would be there subsequent 3 hundred and sixty 5 days. My one question is why does it rely? I mean this replaced into some 5 years in the past. that is previous information and yeah it form of feels like its a brilliant smoke activity. The Dems won the election via attacking the previous administration and that they see it as the thank you to spice up a slumping approval score. "look we would suck yet a minimum of we're not the Bush administration". i wish the yankee all of us is sensible sufficient to examine the placement we are in fairly of the placement we've been in. The previous is the previous and not something greater, purely permit that is and circulate on. If Obama can't succeed without attempting to tear aside Bush then he sucks as a President and as a guy usually. you do no longer tear somebody else down just to make your self look greater advantageous, susceptible very susceptible.

2016-12-26 17:47:05 · answer #2 · answered by lammons 4 · 0 0

My guess is either he knew something that prevented his firing or was just another Bush crony. Either way, Gonzo is now gone, and deservedly so. He was a disgrace to his position and an embarrassment even to the GOP. Good riddance. Looks like Bush's new nominee is getting good praise from both the GOP and Dems alike. That's a good sign that respectability will be re-established in the AG office.

2007-09-18 19:04:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

they needed to have a back up...incase weak Gonzales couldn't take the pressure

2007-09-18 19:04:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Because the US government is corrupt, and fuked up.

2007-09-18 19:08:14 · answer #5 · answered by NotTheStatusQuo 5 · 1 0

Because most sicko's are good at hiding their perversions.

2007-09-18 19:15:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers