Guilty, innocent, or good with toast?
(Poll for school project)
2007-09-18
18:57:59
·
40 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Entertainment & Music
➔ Polls & Surveys
Gaaahhh! You morons who agree with the Glove Theory. The glove was like wet or washed or something, I can't remember what they said, and that stuff shrinks when it gets wet! Of COURSE it didn't fit!
2007-09-18
19:26:50 ·
update #1
Guilty...and finally may get what he deserves. Maybe there will be a badass named Bubba in his prison looking to get some ot the "juice". Then maybe he will feel intense pain like Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman must have felt. Sorry OJ...no Bruno Magli shoes allowed in prison. Only prison issued footware.
2007-09-18 19:04:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm not sure about all of his scandals because I try to ignore a lot of the Hollywood drama. I guess I just don't stay very 'up to date' on all of this stuff. But I know that I used to be a Paralegal, and when I was taking classes, we had to study the Murder trial and half the class was divided to each side of the debate and we had to prove OJ either innocent and guilty. I can tell everyone that after the debate was over, no matter who believed him innocent before the debate, or who was well convinced by their findings, etc., There was too much in records and evidence, etc., that just said he did it and laughed it off. He killed them and then basically stood in the spot light saying 'You can't tough me, do you know who I am. I'm OJ Simpson.' Well, after that, I was appalled by everything I saw in legal justice from Hollywood, and thrilled when that song came out about how you can be famous and get away with everything ... because it's all true. Unfortunately, OJ is guilty and I believe he thinks he is just above everything and everyone and that no matter what he does, no one will ever do anything to him. I mean for Heaven's sake, he cut a deal to write a book about how he 'hypothetically' killed them. What, was that his confession tell-all, without 'admitting' guilt. Frankly I feel he's a sad soul.
Good luck with your school project.
2007-09-19 00:05:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Angel Tears 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Guilty
2007-09-18 19:08:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by lil_sweetiem 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Guilty
2007-09-18 19:07:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by debrasearch 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Guilty is an understatement. Common what type of poll is this. You could make it up in a second. Just hand it in to your teacher saying 105 out of 105 votes for guilty and you will get an A++
2007-09-18 19:01:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by SummerRain Girl 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
OJ is a guy who replaced into thoroughly investigated, replaced into tried in a courtroom of regulation that replaced into presided over by employing a undemanding choose and had the information evaluated by employing a jury who discovered him harmless of homicide. He has continuously maintained his innocence of this deed and he wrote a theoretical e book (which does no longer contain a confession). money replaced into probably the motivation in writing the e book as there's a civil wholesome debt and a would desire to grant an inheritance for his infants etc. The trial lawyer's Cochran, Marcia and Darden wrote their own books and gained tens of millions. some issues that the jury would have seen: -The investigator who discovered the glove later committed PERJURY concerning his racist comments. - yet another investigator took a vial pattern of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it INTO the crime scene. - The glove did no longer in advantageous condition OJ's hand. - There by no skill replaced into the quantity of blood on OJ's physique, clothing, abode or automobile consistent with somebody who had committed that crime in person.. - The homicide weapon replaced into by no skill linked to him or discovered. - The jury replaced into taken to flow to OJ's abode and did no longer see a extensive blood path. - there have been no witnesses to the actual crime. - probably the jury discovered him harmless because of the fact there replaced right into a loss of genuine information to convict. some would disagree with the call besides the undeniable fact that it is unfair for them to blatantly say with a fact that this guy is accountable. at situations a writer controlls the final content textile or perhaps the call of a e book which an author would desire to comply with if he needs the settlement.
2016-10-09 10:56:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have a long list of favorite celebutards and quasi-celebutard ******* who I'd like never to see or hear about for the rest of my life. OJ's on the list.
The problem is that when you think they're gone for good, they rise again like zombies from the grave.
2007-09-18 19:10:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If you want an opinion on the current item I think he is guilty of something.
2007-09-18 19:30:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Lefty 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
First of all when I heard the words "OJ Simpson will be on trial." I thought my time machine had worked. Secondly I was certain they'd be trying him for the past murder charge and not the current ones.
2007-09-18 19:00:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by neve_freak2001 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
My opinions of him ended after Naked Gun 33 1/3. He means nothing to me. Guilty.
2007-09-18 19:00:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by alwaysmoose 7
·
2⤊
0⤋