English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2 answers

I'd say no, because he never had the personal control that Stalin and Pol Pot did. Adjusted for the size of the population, Pol Pot's killing fields have to win this contest and for straight out crazy marching entire urban populations into the jungle is hard to beat. A bit like comparing Charles Manson to Andrei Chikatilo, sure they're both serial killers, but Chikatilo worked at it.

China never had the numbers of secret police that Russia had and I find it hard to hang all the blame of the Cultural Revolution on Mao, when so much of it was grass roots communist party members and students running wild.

Mao may have killed as many with starvation caused by ridiculous top down edicts, but I don't find the same evidence of deliberately targeting entire ethnic groups for famine as you do with Stalin. More stupidity than outright malice.

2007-09-18 20:29:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Probably. There were no killing fields as there were in Cambodia, but Mao treated his people with disdain and disrespect. He did not care how they lived, as long as he looked good internationally.

One thing that really struck me was that Mao sent food aid to Hungary (??) when his people were starving, and when the amount of meat eaten by Hungarians every year was many times that eaten by Chinese.

2007-09-19 02:12:12 · answer #2 · answered by iansand 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers