Bill Clinton had been a serial adulterer for their entire marriage, as everybody with half a brain knows.
In 1988, he called me and said that he and Hillary were considering divorce and he had to get away from her for a while. I offered him my house in Key West, Fla.
Right before the 60 Minutes show during the 1992 campaign, he called for my advice and I suggested that he admit and apologize for the adultery with Flowers and he said "If I did that, I'd have to find a new place to live."
In 1995, reviewing his testimony in the fraud trial of Susan McDougal, he asked me how he should handle his "relationship" with her. I said: "If you had sex with her, admit it. Don't perjure yourself. We can always undo the political damage, but we can't undo the legal damage." He nodded.
For Hillary to pretend injured innocence at this point has only one motive: She needs to somehow justify her strident public defense of her husband.
She can't admit the truth: that she defended him because she didn't want him forced from office — ending both their political careers — because he'd been unfaithful to her.
Hillary, give us a break.
— Dick Morris, an adviser to Bill Clinton for 20 years
2007-09-18 17:16:30 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
soperson - actually and honestly...YES!
My husband and I are totally faithful to each other and we have a great marriage.
2007-09-18 17:42:08 · update #1
The only thing that "battlelax" seems to do effectively is is "get rid" of people when they tick her off..
2007-09-18 17:42:30 · answer #1 · answered by Freethinker 3 · 4⤊ 6⤋
No, liberals are not clever, or they may well be repubs, and easily I easily have a 5 thousand dollar guess with a chum, that bill will undermine hillary's marketing campaign with something stupid... a youthful intern possibly or something of the like. bill's ego won't enable Hillary into workplace... Im up $5,000 yea!
2016-10-19 01:46:02 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
RLJ
Hitlery scares the stuffin' out of me. Her "healthcare reform" by definition is a fascist model. She would have no qualms about enforcing behavior and I can see "jackbooted" thugs coming to our doors to enforce the "exercise" stipulation.
What the Clinton relationship shows me is a reflection of incontinence in the relationship where a self-defined liberal feminist exists. She is masculine, and he relates better to more feminine women. Truthfully if I were Bill saddled with her hide, I'd find some stuff on the side myself. In the dictionary beside the word "*****, witch, whore of Babylon" is a picture of Frau Hitlery.
She has rode on the coat tails of a sociopathic liar. And She knew he was philalandering scumbag in college. It was/is a symbiotic relationship. She was gaining power as he was.
From all I've read about the presidential candidate Hitlery instills fear about the outcome of the 2008 election.
We the people need to not let her ever, ever, ever, ever, sit in the oval office.
2007-09-19 01:45:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Wow....all this old BS. I guess it substitutes for the slow rotting away of our forces in Iraq. The Bush Junta trots out its tame general, Bush gets on TV in prime time, blathers for 15 minutes and everyone yawns..same old, same old. The only bright spot is that the 'Return of OJ'.....taking the public's mind off the fact that the Bush mob has spent us into a financial black hole and divided the formerly United States into theRed/Blue States...just think of the damage these brainless ninnys could do if they actually tried. Clue: Nobody cares that Bill Clinton had or did not have sex with some babe, several babes or a mop.....he's not the president anymore. Sen Clinton hasn't been nominated yet, yet you and all those right wing radio nitwits are building up your fleet of swift-boats.....I dunno...it seems as of you're afraid to just defend your own policies....policies that have cost billions of borrowed dollars and got a lot of people killed or maimed and hasn't done a single damned thing for the American wage-earner. If you're proud of that just say so!
2007-09-18 17:42:47 · answer #4 · answered by Noah H 7 · 5⤊ 3⤋
She stood by her man. She is a crook and a liar too! Hillary is a lesbo!
Edit: Have you noticed how the left doesn't like Dick Morris anymore? They can't stand him since he is not with Bill and Hill anymore....Dick actually came to his senses and joined the "right" party. Democrats are such hypocrites. I love hearing him talk about how Hillary is a total psychopath. If she doesn't get her way she turns into Satan. ha ha.
2007-09-18 18:33:04 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I have absolutely no doubt that Hillary is smart enough. That has never been a particular concern of mine.
Her relationship with her husband has also never particularly been a concern of mine, except for what I consider her sell-out of women. The NOW also condoned Bill's behavior.
I think it is important to point out that Bill did not just commit adultery (sadly, that's not considered a big deal these days by some), but he did it in the oval office. He degraded the office of president in that manner. But all of this I put on Bill, not Hillary.
Hillary's shiftiness is my concern. She seems to be good at putting her finger on the pulse of emotional issues, but where is the follow-through? She votes for Iraq and then campaigns against it when expedient.
Hillary is a chameleon and I do not trust her. Period.
2007-09-18 17:37:08 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 7⤊ 3⤋
I'll say no
Pathological comes to mind when I hear conversation about Mrs. Clinton and some of the other candidates.
I'm not sure she/they are capable of telling the truth. Now that I think of it, most politicians have that problem. (attorney genes)
I have recently taken her off my miserable list of choices.
It's sad when a President who lives an extremely exposed life can hide an affair from his wife? yeah, sure.
2007-09-18 19:29:23 · answer #7 · answered by mishpocha 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Of course IF she didn't know Bill was cheating on her she's not smart enough to run this country. But she did know. Her and Bill got married to each other to further their careers. Which is not necessarily a bad thing.
2007-09-19 02:38:27 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The sad fact is that Queen Hillary the Great is indeed smart enough to run the country. Like you, I wish it weren't so, but that fact and a bazillion dollars in the bank mean that the nomination of the Democrat Party is hers to lose.
I can only see an unforseen health issue forestalling her nomination. Now, wouldn't THAT be ironic, considering her obsession with the great health care "crisis"?!?
2007-09-18 17:28:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Hillary did not CARE about Bill's philandering. She only cares about political power and that is why she stayed married to him. She doesn't care about America either...she is only after the power.
2007-09-19 01:50:27 · answer #10 · answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Who care's about their personal lives??!!
More importantly she had access to an Intelligence Report that showed Iraq had no WMDs and she refused to read it and voted to authorize the invasion of Iraq.
"Clinton did not read the 90-page, classified National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq, according to "Her Way: The Hopes and Ambitions of Hillary Rodham Clinton."
For members of Congress to read the report, they had to go to a secure location on Capitol Hill. The Washington Post reported in 2004 that no more than six senators and a handful of House members were logged as reading the document."
The Left does not trust Hillary Clinton because of her voting record on War, Military Spending and "Free Trade."
The Right hates Hillary over imagined socialism and the fact that Bill had a surplus in more than one way.
2007-09-18 17:38:12 · answer #11 · answered by Richard V 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋