Yes, a lot of people. Tons of criminals, China, CNN, HSU, the foreign fugitive from justice who gave her a lot of illegal campaign donations, a muslim group.
CHICAGO - Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton refused Saturday to forsake campaign donations from lobbyists, turning aside challenges from her two main rivals for the Democratic presidential nomination with a defense for the special interest industry. (they have always owned her). They have to get their pork through, and for a price, they can, through her.
"A lot of those lobbyists, whether you like it or not, represent real Americans, (yeah right) they actually do," Clinton said, drawing boos and hisses from liberal bloggers at the second Yearly Kos convention.
Clinton was asked what three lessons she learned from her failed health care reform effort during the presidency of her husband, Bill Clinton. "It is not enough to have a plan. You've got to have a political strategy," the New York senator said. Wonder what kind of crooked strategy she is cooking up.
2007-09-18 17:21:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by lilly4 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
I think most of the candidates in the demonrat party have a real fear of the whacked fringe in their party, catering to them may win them the primary but catering to them in the generally election is going to flatten them.
Don't forget the Chicoms, Hiu was a symptom of a bigger problem for Hitlery. I believe the Chicoms have more influence on Hitlery then we will ever know. I think the Chicoms are more of a threat to us then Moveon.org. The Chicoms own our debt. This is a threat to our sovereignty and security Moveon.org is just a pain in the ***
Anytime a politician leads their run for the office based on fear of a certain special interest group they are digging holes.
We see it with the Religious right nut jobs as well so it's not solely a democrat issue.
My vote will be in the RNC primary for one of the candidates who is not perceived as the media babies. I live in the plains and most of the top tier candidates are from east of the mississippi and have no clue as to what "real americans" feel.
My hopes at this point are pretty nil at this point for Huckabee, Tancredo, Hunter or Paul to get the nomination but as I see it they are the only candidates with the will or moxy to stop the slide into a socialist state. As I see the top tier Republicans are RINOS and more of the same socialistic bullsh*t.
2007-09-19 02:51:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Moveon and the Chinese Communists own Hillary. Moveon gave over twice as much money to liberals as the NRA gave to all candidates in 2006, yet the media still whines about the influence of the NRA.
2007-09-18 23:55:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
It's so fun to see you guys on the right get your panties in a bunch because there's finally a group on the left that has some fundraising power. We've had the Moral Majority, the Christian Coalition, Focus on the Family, the NRA, the KKK, the oil companies, the Swift Boaters, the health insurance companies, the pharmaceuticals, and too many other groups to mention who have "owned" the Republican candidates for decades. Yet did you care? Nope! You thought it was fine.
Now comes along a grass roots organization made up of ordinary Americans and funded by ordinary Americans--NOT George Soros, quit watching Bill O'Reilly and get some facts--and you guys are all up in arms. It's hysterical! Your facts are wrong, your hysteria is amusing. I bet you've never even gone to the MoveOn website to see what is really there.
Let's all agree to start thinking for ourselves instead of parroting propaganda from Rush and Hannity, shall we?
2007-09-18 17:31:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
No more slimely than her buying the Jewish vote in New York. Can't remember exactly where, but there was a pic of Hillary with a group of Hasidic Jewish Rabbis all crowded around her. Two items of importance here....Hasidic Rabbis are FORBIDDEN to be touched or touch another woman other than his wife and her known anti-semetic rants. I think it is less shameful for candidates to attempt to buy votes--when you consider these 'men of the cloth' selling themselves and their priciples for monetary gain.
2016-05-18 02:08:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by esther 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
All of the Democratic candidates seem to be controlled by MoveOn. They all, especially Clinton and Obama, appear to be totally frightened by this evil organization and continually deflect questions concerning their relationship with MoveOn. George Soros is the resurrected Joe McCarthy, only, this time, he's got the Dems quaking with fear!
2007-09-18 17:23:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by foster 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
If they elected anti-war dems where are they? Most of the dems who got in ran on pro-war tickets. Moveon is suffering from an overinflated sense of value methinks. But that is fine by me, their antics will help conservatives get elected. Especially now that the effort to run out the conservative dems is underway.
2007-09-18 17:16:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by JFra472449 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
No man would want to "own a peice" of YOU. LOL
IF YOU WANNA TALK LIKE THAT.
Typical non-sencial right wing "I dont have a life Im just a housewife who hangs on Rush Limbaush's every word" blather .
It MoveOn tells some truth about Bush's illegal war atrocities that Xtians hypocritically accept MORE POWER TOO THEM.
2007-09-19 05:31:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jim W 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
Pretty much. Hillary said she wanted to end the "Politics of personal attacks", but when Moveon personally attacked General Patraeus, a man whose served his country honorably for decades she remained silent. She just want personal attack to stop against her, anyone else is fair game. Especially if George Soros is the one doing the attacking.
2007-09-18 17:19:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
no. hillary will still do whatever she wants to do. moveon.org may complain a little bit here and there, but it doesn't matter because on election day they will be firmly behind hillary. moveon's goal is to get democrats elected to further the socialist agenda, and the fact they may not see eye to eye on everything will be of little consequence when it's time to punch the card.
2007-09-18 17:15:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by White 5
·
2⤊
3⤋