1. I am not in favor of a man hitting a woman.
2. I am not in favor of a woman slapping a man.
3. I am not in favor of a woman kicking a man's testicles unless he is trying to rape her (equal force self-defense).
4. I am not in favor of a woman cheating on a man.
5. I am not in favor of cutting off a man's penis or crushing his testicles.
6. I am not in favor of a man cheating on a woman.
7. I am not in favor of breaking anyone's jaw.
8. I am not in favor of castrating you.
9. I am not in favor of ridiculous prejudices and laws.
10. I am, however, in favor of you getting some anger management education.
2007-09-18 17:22:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by javadic 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
Okay, your question was basically a rant, so some of the anger issues can be ignored because once people get rolling, things get said in rants that normally would never see the light of day.
I grew up in a martial arts school, so my opinion is biased by the fact that I rarely see gender. Don't get me wrong, I can tell the difference between boys and girls. I just don't don't care if they are male or female.
Violence is RARELY going to solve a problem. Committing an act of violence against another person is wrong. Period. If someone hurts you, than that still does not mean that you have to hurt them back. Two wrongs do not make a right.
If someone slaps you out of anger, than there is no way they are getting out of the situation with honor and dignity. If you hit them back, than all you have done is sink yourself to their level.
The only instance where I believe that answering blows are acceptable are in life threatening situations. At that point, you must do what is necessary to remove yourself from the situation. However, if you (male or female) use more force than the bare minimum to get away, you are just as wrong as the person who initiated physical contact.
Common sense must come into play when the decision is made to return force. A child is also a human, but if a three year old runs up and punches you are you going to lay them out? Of course not.
Assess your level of threat. I have two friends, one of which is absolutely no physical threat to me, the other one could be a definite physical problem. My friends are male, I'm female. If the first friend tried to hit me than I would ignore the physicality of the situation and try to fix the problem. If the second friend tried to hit me I would have to put him down, and then fix the issue. The difference between the two is that if the first friend actually landed his blow I probably wouldn't even feel it. However, if my other friend landed his blow...I'd be out for the count.
Most importantly...My answer to the issue would be the same regardless of my friend's gender. Male or female, if they did not pose a physical threat than it doesn't matter if there is imminent violence. Only physical threats need be met by a neutralizing force.
2007-09-19 01:42:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by lkydragn 4
·
3⤊
2⤋
I personally believe in equality, but I'm not an extremist. I find your views to be only fueled by anger and possible personal experience. Also, the fact that you labeled and assumed all women on yahoo are "Nazis" demonstrates your immaturity and lack of sense.
I think violence is violence no matter the sex is unnecessary unless it's self defense. We've come to an age where physical violence/brutality has no place, no matter if you are a man or a woman.
I'm not a feminist but I do believe women have rights. I honestly don't think you understand the route of feminism nor would you even try to read into it as you've already "assumed" what it is all about. Nowhere in the "feminist mein kampf" does it read: women have the right to hit men and castrate them.
Equality for women is about being able to do anything men are able to do...Perhaps that's where the misconceptions come from that violence is okay, because men did it first so now women want a stab at it too...LOL.
2007-09-19 01:31:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bella K 1
·
0⤊
3⤋
I can do some serious damage to a man if I'm sufficiently provoked. I'm not a little woman. In fact, I'm about as tall and heavy as most men are. It's very unusual to see a man who is a lot taller than me. However, I think such violence is wrong and I would never lash out unless I was acting in self-defense. Also, I would not go for a man's private parts when kicking at his kneecaps, hitting his Adam's Apple, or poking his eyes would be more effective. Many men instinctively learn to protect their testicles so for many women, it would actually be a waste to try to hit that area.
2007-09-19 01:10:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by RoVale 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
If she slap you, just punch her back. There shouldn't be any double standard. The way I see it, if a woman strike a man, she is basically putting herself in a man place. If the feminist care so much about equality, then they shouldn't have any problem with men hiting women(if the woman hit the man first).
If a women touches me, her *** will be on the ground, plain and simple. I don't give out special benefit base on race and gender.
Don't hit a man if you can't take the hit.
Heh, the feminist are obviously going to give me a thumb down for this. I'm not surprise at all, though.
2007-09-19 00:27:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
2⤋
I don't believe anyone should hit another person. Violence is redundant and superfluous. Unless someone is acutally fighting for their life then i see no need for fists when words are more powerful anyway.
I can understand where you are coming from but it does swing both ways. People just have to think before they react.
2007-09-19 00:12:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ness B 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
No one should hit anyone else unless it's in the name self-defense. I don't care what they did — if they didn't hit you first, keep your hands to yourself. This goes for men and women.
2007-09-19 09:20:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Rio Madeira 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
So you think it's okay to hit a woman??? Men are not supposed to hit women because they are stronger, and could seriously hurt a woman. When a woman hits a man, it isn't likely that she will do any serious damage, and men can take it. Now as for the other stuff...like women kicking men in the testicles and threatening to cut off vital male organs, that is terrible. Kicking a guy where it hurts is very mean, and I see no reason for it unless a guy hits a woman first and she needs to defend herself. But when a woman just slaps a guy across the face, that's not really a big deal. I don't mean to say women are weak, but most men are just built bigger and stronger, and most women usually can't defend themselves against men very well.
2007-09-19 00:10:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by mandy 3
·
3⤊
7⤋
Olny stupid people think that violence against women is worse than violence against men, but, too bad most people are stupid.
I would not hit anybody, unless the person hit me first.
2007-09-19 04:45:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Marcelo R 2
·
3⤊
2⤋
You have an interesting point of view, but your tone is scary.
You're not going to win anyone over by calling them nazis and using a lot of gratuitous angry profanity.
Is there a way you might rephrase this so others would give your views more considered contemplation? (You can see the teacher in me coming out.)
2007-09-19 00:05:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Steve-O 5
·
5⤊
3⤋