2007-09-18 15:55:17 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
This reminds me somewhat of Richard Hooker, who wrote M*A*S*H. He was accused of being a pacifist. He replied that those who thought so were missing his point. What he didn't like was the ARMY (and its BS). Dilbert is the business version of the same thing. It isn't anti-capitalist. It's anti-cubicle.
2007-09-18 16:13:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Considering how rich and famous his creator, Scott Adams, is I would have to say Dilbert is DEFINITELY a capitalist.
2007-09-18 15:59:49 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Taco 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
He's just a cartoon character like Coulter, Malkin, Beck and Lumbaugh.
.
2007-09-18 16:01:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Nope and troy proves that libs have no sense of reality
2007-09-18 16:11:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he is a cartoon and not a real person whom would be capable of having a political association.
2007-09-18 16:01:02 · answer #5 · answered by God 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Huh? Ummm....no....
2007-09-18 15:59:57 · answer #6 · answered by linus_van_pelt_4968 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, he's a slave to the man.
2007-09-18 16:00:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
why would you think that?
2007-09-20 12:47:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2007-09-18 16:01:38 · answer #9 · answered by Coachstoll 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋