During the last 50 years the UK and many other countries have installed and then helped dictators.Then helped?

Question

to depose them.Why not do the same with Mugabe ? He's worse than most in terms of cruelty.

Answer 1

Very good point but there is absolutely no economic advantage to removing Mugabe such as he has not got any oil! The UK screams about tyranny and human rights but backs the worst offenders of tyranny, examples of this can be seen in Saudia Arabia, Uzbeckistan, Turkmenistan and many more. They are simply not interested in human rights it is just something to exploit conveniently when needed.

Answer 2

Despite all that mugabe is and does now. He was once a great man who won the respect of his people and the people of his neighbouring nations. Only difference is while the other african heroes who achieved independance and quit when they lost elections. mugabe has not.
it seems the western powers are hoping that the deposing of mugabe can be done without warfare and that it cna be achieved by zimbabwes neighbours

Answer 3

Decode this lyrics " You raised me up"
50 years later getting kick on the butts as casualty of the dead Mummy in not worshiping God.
Ever wonder who were the dogs that bite it's master?
Ever wonder who were climbing up the coconut trees and still look green as casualty of the dead Mummy in not worshiping God.
Exodus 20.1-2, Leviticus 26.13

Answer 4

He hasn't got any oil. The good old U.S of A would have been in there to spread democracy, and get rid of that nasty little dictator long ago if he had.

Answer 5

Theres not much chance of a pro-Soviet insurgency taking power and inviting Russian bases there any more.

Answer 6

Dont you think the UK & USA have done enough damage?"helping" other countries