Can you answer this biology question?

Question

Scientists can determine the age of a substance using a method that compares the amounts of different forms of carbon atoms present in the substance. Is this method more useful for organic substances or inorganic substances?

Answer 1

Here's a passage for you that should clear it up:

"Organic compounds are the compounds made up of the chemical element carbon. Inorganic compounds do not contain carbon. Inorganic chemicals include sulfur, oxygen, nitrogen, silver, copper, etc. Living things are composed primarily of organic compounds but the organic compounds also have lots of hydrogen and oxygen with small amounts of other inorganic elements sulfur, copper, magnesium, etc. When living things die, these organic compounds may change form to become compost, or with even greater time, petroleum. "

http://www.adbio.com/multifix/agri/organic_chemical.htm

Answer 2

Organic substances. One of the defining characterisitcs of an organic compound is the presence of carbon.

Answer 3

this method is known as carbon dating. it uses the carbon molecules that are present in the once living substance. if it was once living, it is organic.

Answer 4

I somewhat have been blocked additionally. an identical guy or woman who blocked @secretsauce additionally blocked me. She would not like it whilst her idiotic statements approximately evolution are refuted. I somewhat have additionally been stated and my answer deleted quite a few cases because of the fact those reporting me do no longer like it once I disclose the lies they use approximately evolution. And it form of feels that it rather is impossible to get Y!A to opposite the deletion. as an occasion, in a pair of cases the reporter had used hyperlinks to information superhighway web content that used despicable arguments against evolution and that i uncovered them for being despicable. i attempted to get my answer reinstated yet curiously the hypocrisy of the deletion did no longer propose something. by ability of how, curiously that my punishment for being stated is to have my avatar label as a precise Contributor additionally deleted. extra: @im: "you'll be blocked from conversing with an solutions member, yet you won't be in a position to be blocked from answering the question of any solutions member. " incorrect! If the member blocks you, the question would not arise once you click on it. rather there's a message announcing you are able to't get admission to the question right this moment. extra: @Mithroramir: "the tremendous bang concept is the scientific introduction tale, even yet it claims that mild can not age (relativity concept) and yet it does age by ability of distinctive characteristic of the backround microwave radiation got here upon by ability of Penzias and Wilson. So which of those 2 jointly unique propositions is real? " you don't comprehend what the cosmic microwave background is. the growth of area from the time of the tremendous bang has stretched the unique radiation to a plenty decrease frequency. huge Bang concept held that the unique radiation could have stretched by ability of a undeniable quantity and that quantity improve into what improve into measured. That length provided confirmation of the tremendous Bang. you may desire to get your information from solid supplies (or is what you stated only 1 thing which you erroneously got here up with on your individual innovations).

Answer 5

organic substances. i think. it makes sense considering carbon makes up all living things..... but don't quote me if this is for homework. :) i take chemistry right now.