English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The following is not my opinion, but FACT:

She [Hillary Clinton] said she could envision a day when "you have to show proof to your employer that you're insured as a part of the job interview — like when your kid goes to school and has to show proof of vaccination," but said such details would be worked out through negotiations with Congress.

And to think that liberals call republicans Nazis!

2007-09-18 10:27:20 · 21 answers · asked by ? 5 in Politics & Government Politics

21 answers

Yes...

2007-09-18 10:31:24 · answer #1 · answered by King 5 · 3 5

that's the biggest shaggy dog tale of all, there are not a super type of Hillary followers. the internet is permitting human beings for the 1st time to work out by the hype in our political gadget. on line boards practice that the emporer has no clothing, the 'frontrunners' are no longer something extra beneficial than the mainstream media's annointees. final election maximum electorate did no longer know the thank you to apply the internet nicely sufficient to get thier very own assistance. Now that that is changing, politicians and the media are crapping thier collective pants on the thought they might no longer income off our skill to in user-friendly terms get our political perception from 3 television stations.

2016-10-19 00:44:31 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I won't vote for her because she reminds me of another politican that I don't like;

"We must stop thinking of the individual and start thinking about what is best for society." [Hillary Clinton, 1993]

"It is thus necessary that the individual should come to realize that his own ego is of no importance in comparison with the existence of his nation; that the position of the individual ego is conditioned solely by the interests of the nation as a whole ... that above all the unity of a nation's spirit and will are worth far more than the freedom of the spirit and will of an individual. .... This state of mind, which subordinates the interests of the ego to the conservation of the community, is really the first premise for every truly human culture .... we understand only the individual's capacity to make sacrifices for the community, for his fellow man." [Adolph Hitler, 1933]

The main plank in the National Socialist program is to abolish the liberalistic concept of the individual and the Marxist concept of humanity and to substitute for them the folk community, rooted in the soil and bound together by the bond of its common blood." [Adolph Hitler, quoted in Hitler, A Study in Tyranny, by Alan Bullock (Harper Collins, NY)]

Or how about this guy;

Comrades! We must abolish the cult of the individual decisively, once and for all." [Nikita Khrushchev , February 25, 1956 20th Congress of the Communist Party]

Or this guy;

"All our lives we fought against exalting the individual, against the elevation of the single person, and long ago we were over and done with the business of a hero, and here it comes up again: the glorification of one personality. This is not good at all." [Vladimir Lenin, as quoted in Not by Politics Alone]

See the common thread in these statements?


And furthermore her political philosophy expressed in that statement too closely resembles this one;

Fascist ethics begin ... with the acknowledgment that it is not the individual who confers a meaning upon society, but it is, instead, the existence of a human society which determines the human character of the individual. According to Fascism, a true, a great spiritual life cannot take place unless the State has risen to a position of pre-eminence in the world of man. The curtailment of liberty thus becomes justified at once, and this need of rising the State to its rightful position. [Mario Palmieri, "The Philosophy of Fascism" 1936]

2007-09-20 15:33:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

In 1956, during the USSR days, Nikita Kruschev pounded with his shoe on the podium at the U.N. and said, "We will bury you".

They have done it
Through apathy
Through socialist 'entertainers'
Through the public schools
Through the 'counter culture' movement of the 60's
Through perseverence
They have turned the U.S.A. into 21st century soviet socialist republic.
Just like Kruschev promised.

2007-09-18 10:56:19 · answer #4 · answered by credo quia est absurdum 7 · 2 1

Don't worry, it's just you. I love how you spend your last sentence talking about how all liberals call conservatives Nazis, and then you decide to lob back that liberals are Communists. It isn't fun when you're being grouped with a bunch of people who killed 6 million Jews, right? Then why are you lobbing the same sort of insults back at liberals? You ruin your own point, and all the sympathy people could have for your being wrongly accused.
Besides that, your quote has nothing to do with communism. It's still taking place in a capitalist society, and even the socialized health care system isn't communist. There's a difference between socialism and communism, look them up sometime.

2007-09-18 10:44:06 · answer #5 · answered by whiteflame55 6 · 3 4

Not communism... yet. But socialism/fascism, yes.

A recent Hillary quote:
"When I'm president, privatization is off the table because it's not the answer to anything."
Hillary Rodham, September 3, 2007 AARP Legislative Conference

2007-09-18 10:39:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6 2

Oh, it's not just you. The liberal media might give her a pass, but there's no doubt that communism is starting to come alive in America. After all those years of fighting communism, the leader of a major party wants to bring it here.

2007-09-18 10:45:49 · answer #7 · answered by Dan 4 · 2 4

LOL
its not just you!!
we are all aware that Hillary is a Communist!!
Its just that some of us are not in Denial about her!!
the She Beast is Evil in its purest form
their is no getting around it!!
she is EVIL!

2007-09-18 12:05:31 · answer #8 · answered by KittyCatFishApe 3 · 2 1

Let's see some details. I don't equate health insurance to communism. Something needs to be done about the uninsured and the underinsured. If you get a terrible disease, is it really necessary to have to exhaust all your savings in order to keep alive? If you say "Yes" I hope it never happens to you.

2007-09-18 10:43:42 · answer #9 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 1 5

With public health care, yes.

2007-09-18 10:30:40 · answer #10 · answered by Taylor G 4 · 3 2

It's you. The real fact is that you right wingers are scared stiff of Hillary. I find that real funny seeing that you are all such tough guys when it comes to terrorism. Just shows you're not as tough as you think you are, scaredy cat.

2007-09-18 10:32:01 · answer #11 · answered by Pop D 5 · 3 6

fedest.com, questions and answers