If it was fathers then they'd have no problem in exposing it. And the government launched a massive knee jerk reaction to help abuse anyone who exposed the mothers who kill..... Professor Sir Roy Meadows was rightd!! His Evidence still stands. The evidence they used to 'discredit' his findings was it's self discredited. He was right. We *have* an epidemic of mothers who kill..... Again, imagine this was fathers and you know that there would be nowhere near as much effort put into aiding and abetting them. You know it. Sexism is bad but when it helps kill our children then something has to be done.
-------------------------------------------------------------
http://news.independent.co.uk/health/article2785464.ece . Paper one
Paediatricians accuse General Medical Council of putting children at risk
http://society.guardian.co.uk/nhsperformance/story/0,,1512227,00.html Paper two
2007-09-18 09:16:43 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
There's always the one dufus who can't read who says, 'what are you talking about?' I'm not talking I'm writing, and the topic is very clearly articulated. [The Guardian is one of the best papers in the world]
2007-09-18 09:33:15 · update #1
its taboo in our society
2007-09-18 09:38:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
First circulate see her very own physician he can propose that see desires to be evaluated via a clinical professional this may be achieved via the state psychological wellness dept. that could be a challenging elect yet while she refuses help and what you're saying is genuine it would shop her existence and get her back to popular
2016-12-26 17:05:57 · answer #2 · answered by bedgood 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What are you talking about?
2007-09-18 09:28:13 · answer #3 · answered by cyanne2ak 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋