English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why is the Separation of power part of the U.S Constitution?

2007-09-18 08:34:01 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities History

5 answers

SEPERATION OF POWERS IS PART OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION BECAUSE WITHOUT IT THE GOVERNMENT WILL BE CENTRALIZED AND THE PRESIDENT WILL HAVE FULL POWER OF THE COUNTRY.(THE JUDICIAL, EXECUTIVE,AND LEGISLATIVE BRANCHES THAT WERE SUPPOSE TO BE SEPERATED, NOW RELY ON ONE PERSON)

THIS WOULD BE EQUAL TO A DICTATORSHIP, OR A ONE-MAN RULE. PEOPLE ARE NOT PERFECT AND HAVE FLAWS, SO IMAGINE IF A FLAW IS EXPOSED OR DONE WHILE THE PRESIDENT IS IN POWER, THE COUNTRY MAY FALL.

2007-09-18 09:34:31 · answer #1 · answered by Naty:Co-Emperor Has Returned 6 · 1 0

The legislative branch exams the two the administrative and the judicial branch via its capability to question and do away with from workplace any member of those branches decrease than the wonderful situations. The legislature additionally has a capability of checking those branches, by using fact it has the capability to suited or no longer suited funds in the federal funds for the different branches to function. If Congress does not provide those branches the money they'd desire to function then those operation may be curtailed. The legislative branch exams the executives capability to behave specially areas which includes making treaties and appointing ambassadors and judges decrease than the "suggestion and Consent" clause. the administrative's treaties and appointments would desire to be approved via the Senate beforehand they're useful. The legislature has yet another examine on the judicial branch by using fact it has the capability to create or no longer create courts different than the final court. Congress may even substitute the form of justices on the final court if it desires to. the administrative has a examine on the legislative branch via having the capability to veto law it deems is beside the point, situation to the wonderful of Congress to override the veto on a vote of two/3 of the individuals. the administrative has an implied examine on the judicial branch, by using fact the judicial branch desires the administrative branch to enforce its rulings. without the tension of hands and police powers of the administrative branch, judicial decrees might unenforceable and valueless. the administrative has the capability to reserve Congress to convene whether that is needed. The judicial branch has no specific exams on the different branches in the form, whether it does have the capability of "judicial evaluate." that's the capability to make certain whether a regulation or govt action is or isn't constitutional. If the ruling is that that is unconstitutional, the regulation or action turns into null and void. This capability can't be exercised on the whim of the the judicial branch. it may evaluate the regulation provided that it comes beforehand the court in a real case. The judicial branch will possibly no longer even provide an advisory opinion. There are greater methods the branches work together with one yet another.

2016-12-26 17:02:30 · answer #2 · answered by bedgood 4 · 0 0

To prevent corruption. Not that it matters nowadays. All of the branches of government are in bed with each other and the whole lot is corrupt and we desperately need a revolution in our nations capital .

2007-09-18 08:38:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

"Checks and balances" - no control to a supreme monarchy. This way each branch has acountablity to another.

2007-09-18 08:38:03 · answer #4 · answered by TANGERENEMAN 2 · 2 0

OBVIOUSLY PART OF THE BUILT IN CHECKS AND BALANCES SO ONE BRANCH WILL NOT GAIN TOO MUCH POWER.

2007-09-18 08:52:30 · answer #5 · answered by Loren S 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers