used by President GWBush, prior to the invasion of Afganistan and Iraq, and now they use that information, to bash GWB ??? It must be so, since their rhoedoric is so intense !!!!
Since we Independents, Conservatives, and Liberatarians were not provided with this vital information, by which we may speak upon with such authority as the Liberals, does this constitute discrimination??? Can we form an enity to SUE the LIBERALS, and obtain this information???? SURELY the Liberals do not speak, scream their utterances (scatology) from a position of ignorance !!!!!!!!!!
Can we Independends gain these classified documents through a LIBERAL court of law, so we are not ignorant, as seen in the eyes of the Liberals????
toro gringo
2007-09-18
07:50:55
·
26 answers
·
asked by
NONAME
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Some got it, some didn't, probably some never will understand.
toro gringo
2007-09-18
08:21:32 ·
update #1
Well that is about one of the easiest questions to answer.
It is the liberal democrat Congress members that leak the information to the media. I mean, didn't we have that clearly examplified by the Valerie Plame issue?
Further, we have former Clinton officials that have no problem "finding" documents from the National Archives. I mean haven't you heard of Sandy Burglar?
Oh and let's not forget the best example of having the correct information. Remember Dan Rather? Clearly, he had the correct documents in his posession and the Bush administration tampered with his documents.
And I think that we non-liberals do have a class action complaint to be raised against the liberals. And if we take it to a liberal judge, I bet we would actually be able to win.
For those of you who think all the information has been released, you better go look again. Only a few of the classified documents have been released. The others were stolen by Sandy Burger.
2007-09-18 08:03:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Michael H 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Um, have you ever heard of information coming up after the fact? No one is saying that they had this information prior to the invasion, the only information that that's being said about is stuff that was said before the invasion. Besides that, I don't see how liberals should be sued for feeling justified in their claims. If that's true, lets just sue every politician in the world, they all act so justified. I don't remember ever having "scream[ed my] utternances from a position of ignorance," in fact, I spend much of my time debating in a civilized manner with actual facts at my disposal. There aren't any classified documents from our side people are not showing you. If there were, what purpose would there be to us hiding it?
Oh, and the supreme court, last I checked, was conservative mostly.
2007-09-18 08:05:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by whiteflame55 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Such classifications prepare basically to counsel over which the government of the U. S. and its companies can workout administration upon. The 'affair' (If that's what you may desire to call it, between former President William Jefferson Clinton and Ms. Lewinski is public and undemanding know-how. it particularly is been written approximately in great element to boot as being a media sensation for nicely over a 12 months and a a million/2, it would be quite confusing to make this incident disappear.
2016-10-04 23:01:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, I wonder why liberals speak as if they have first hand professionally gathered intellegence from the intellegence community, when they gather it from the TV, or websites that will post tripe bent to bring them into beliving it as if they've been here. I don't see too many liberals here, in fact they would not like it here...politically.
I'll tell ya what. I challenge any liberal out there worth his salt to join me here in Iraq, dawn some gear (85 lbs of it), endure the heat and witness what I witness on a first hand basis.
You'll see schools going up, infratructure being rebuilt, power plants being built, hospitals, food clean running water, the meetings with territory elders on what they need from us.....you name it. The stuff the liberal media would never publish because it's boring to the masses!
C'mon down, you're the next contestant on the 'Truth is Right'...if you can bear it!
2007-09-18 08:12:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by jimmyd 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
The real Bush haters have hated him since he took office he's just not on their team. Assuming the war is a mistake, the blame can be spread around quite a bit - even to Hillary and Kerry.
Their guy didn't win so therefore Bush must have stolen the election - right under everyones noses.
2007-09-18 08:04:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
You know, if you actually did a little thinking with your own brain and even did some research, you would find that almost all of it is available for public consumption via the internet or, in case you forgot of their existence, bookstores! There aren't any secrets that we have. We just happen to have a better reading list and more inquisitive minds that ask the question, "why?" instead of just putting another $4 gallon of gas in the SUV while the kids are inside getting their McD's on the way to soccer practice while no one is paying any attention to anything but the cell phones, ipods, mp3s and Britney.
2007-09-18 08:00:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by commonsense 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
Wait, when did this happen?? I am labeld a liberal & lefty & I wasn't given any information! That just isn't fair! Who has been keeping this info from me, was it you?? I will blame you for that then! (that is the republican way, isn't it?)
2007-09-18 08:01:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by fairly smart 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Based on most of the answers here, humility must be a prerequisite to registering Democrat.
2007-09-18 08:08:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Maudie 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Going on the info at hand and making up excuses to start a war are two different things. If his inteligence was so lacking to begin with, maybe he should have waited longer to start the war.
2007-09-18 07:57:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Kevy 7
·
5⤊
2⤋
Answer: NO! I bartered ...well thats personal and a bit private, to get to the secret site the libs use to garner their "facts".
2007-09-18 08:07:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by trumain 5
·
1⤊
1⤋