English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If you dont, explain why.



thanks

2007-09-18 07:40:33 · 35 answers · asked by ABBBYY 2 in Politics & Government Politics

So basically half of you say he is one of the worst presidents, some say he is close, but carter was the worst or clinton. Then the others say he isnt the worst and that you like him. Hmm, i agree with half, i dont like bush nor will i ever.
I really dont think clinto or carter were that bad?


ohwell, thanks.

2007-09-18 08:00:28 · update #1

35 answers

I believe he is & time will prove it out. He has done more to damage this country & get our kids killed, raising oil prices, & not doing enough to get the real perpertrator of the 9/11 attacks. Check out a book called Bushit!, written by a gent whose last name is Hubler. It tells a lot of what he did in his first term alone! Your blood will boil if you have a reasonable IQ, & can comprehend it, which I believe you can because of your question! I couldn't read more than 10 pages at a time because it made me so angry! This info is all documented in the legislature too, it isn't just someone writing stories, you can look it all up! But, the bushies can't read past a 3rd grade level, so they just discount it.
Carter wasn't great, but he did try, & he did some good things. He decided not to run again, because he knew it.
Give him a little credit for that! And, he has more than redeemed himself since then! Bush will fade into the darkness & hopefully never be heard from again!
Clinton was/is a snake, but he did do a lot to get this country running well. I was making money & had health insurance, & there was peace & a healthy surplus in the coffers when he left office. I am sure there were plenty of mistakes made, it was all new territory for all of us. Bush hasn't handled it well at all, so he blames Clinton. Republicans blame people for their mistakes, usually Democrats, but we have wide shoulders & we know 99.9% isn't correct so...have a nice day anyway!

2007-09-18 07:52:30 · answer #1 · answered by fairly smart 7 · 3 2

How can anyone KNOW he was the worst in history. Is there anyone on YA that has lived through all the presidencies? I'd guess the average person on YA has lived through maybe 5-9 but not 43 presidencies.

History books present different facts well after the history was made. Possibly they were many worse presidents. So unless you were really old enough to listen to or know their policies, how many can you REALLY say were worse? 10 years from now their will be a different opinion as there was during Viet Nam Era and Korea and WWII and WWI.

Pretty amazing that everyone KNOWS for a fact who the worse was.

2007-09-18 09:00:51 · answer #2 · answered by Ret. Sgt. 7 · 0 1

Just exactly what are you asking?

"Worst" with regard to what?.... economy?... social security?.... welfare?..... farm bill?... federal highway funding?..... medicare?.... employment?....

Or, do you just mean in terms of popularity?

Or, do you even know exactly what you are asking?

Listen.... are you aware we have had 43 presidents over 250 years?! Just please explain to all of us exactly how any ordinary person would be able to answer your question with even a trace of accuracy.

About 99% of us couldn't even name the last 10 presidents in proper order!!!!!!!!! We don't know crap about the job the others have done.

The truth is George Bush was in office on 9/11/01 which happens to mark the beginning of the biggest and most significant transformation this country has seen since the mid 1960's.

Who are we to judge how anyone else would have done any better given the same situation? We have NO ONE to compare Bush to... No bench mark to look at for something like this.

Even the strongest among us would be half crazy by now if we were faced with half the crap he's had to do in office.

I suggest we all shut up and get off this guy's back for a while and let him finish out his presidency.

2007-09-18 08:09:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Following the 9/11, George W and alongside with different government politicians like Dick Cheney began the conflict in Iraq. It has in no way been shown that Iraq or any neighboring countries replaced into at the back of 9/11. hundreds of youthful American infantrymen have died over there for purely approximately no longer something on condition that whilst in the present day Iraq continues to be residing in extra beneficial turmoil. comparable state of affairs is repeating in Afghanistan. we would desire to consistently no longer even have sent our infantrymen interior the middle east. the protection rigidity needed a conflict and the Bush administration gave it to them. In wartime some human beings make billions of greenbacks. until now Dick Cheney grew to alter into vice-president he replaced into working an extremely massive catering (between different issues) company in Texas. Then our troops have been sent to Iraq. that comparable company have been given comprehensive settlement to grant all nutrition needed to the U. S. military in Iraq. It replaced into stated by using some experts that there has been a "entire" of $20 billions charged to the U. S. goverment with regards to that particular catering settlement.. I personnally suspect that our provider adult males and females human beings have been sent to Iraq to guard the state of Israël who have been threatened many circumstances to be destroyed by using Sadam Hussein. of direction there is likewise the oil element.

2016-10-09 10:08:21 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

He is the worst, his daddy is next in line. There hasn't been a good president since JFK, and look what happened to him.
The Bush administration have commited so many felony's against the American people, and humanity for that matter, they should be sitting on death row, with an expedited sentence.

2007-09-18 07:53:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

I believe he IS the worst president. I have a few reasons. Firstly, no one in our history has ever raised the national debt so tremendously as he has, even with respect to inflation. Second, he invaded a country without the permission of Congress or the UN on a basis that was proven flawed, then changed that basis later on. Third, he has interned many people of Middle Eastern decent in this country and from elsewhere with little or no basis. There's quite a bit more, but 3 reasons is enough for now.

2007-09-18 07:47:34 · answer #6 · answered by whiteflame55 6 · 7 4

No. Nor is he one of the best. I think some of his domestic policies have been less than beneficial, especially the entitlement increases and the protectionism, but his foreign policy has been strong, even in the face of withering (though misguided) criticism.

2007-09-18 07:53:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

It's too soon to tell. How events work themselves out in the Middle East will have a lot to do with it.

2007-09-18 07:51:09 · answer #8 · answered by Sean 7 · 1 2

From what I have seen, Jimmie Carter.
To his credit, he did get Egypt and Isreal to agree to the Camp David agreementr and end hostilities between them.
He would have been a tremendous secretary of state, but as a president, pathetic. No leadership whatsoever.

2007-09-18 07:49:56 · answer #9 · answered by TedEx 7 · 4 4

This question gets asked, what, 3-4 times a week and the same answers appear------Carter, Clinton, Hoover, Harding.

2007-09-18 07:46:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 5

fedest.com, questions and answers