English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

should they both be in the same jail cell, Hillary is just smarter and avoided being got caught.

Who's more crooked and why?

2007-09-18 07:38:11 · 21 answers · asked by anthony p 3 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

HOW DO YOU KNOW HILLARY DID NOT HAVE ALL THOSE PEOPLE AROUND HER KILLED!!!

2007-09-18 11:08:53 · update #1

21 answers

OJ

2007-09-26 07:40:18 · answer #1 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0 0

Fools. HILLARY by far. There have been countless deaths of people around the Clinton's, most of the people had information that would have put the Clinton in jail. Hmm. OJ = 2, Clinton's = a lot more than two.

I cant remember the name of the guy who was found in the park in Washington DC with a 9mm gunshot wound to the back of the head and it was ruled suicide. Although he was found with a .38. He was working for the Clinton's.

Hillary is so much more crooked that OJ. OJ got good lawyers, Hillary got to the police!!!

2007-09-18 14:51:16 · answer #2 · answered by kb3hmj 3 · 0 0

Dear uninformed, poorly educated and unread poster:
What has Hillary done that is crooked? And if Hillary is crooked, she still looks like a saint next to your braindead, unprincipled, sold out W. There is TONS of evidence to post that supports this but I don't have a week to list all the sources. You the idiotic poster, quote no source at all! Check out the sarge927 post - and people only think the libs are conspiracy theorists. And even if the clintons did have some connection to your 'mysterious deaths under the Clintons' - again they total less than the 4000 American soldiers and something like 600,000 Iraqis. So go ahead you guys, keep making arguments as to why the libs and dems are far better choices than the murderers in office now.

2007-09-18 14:46:21 · answer #3 · answered by commonsense 5 · 0 0

Now, now, now! Let's be fair, here.

O.J. is not a crook.
He's just a murderer.

Now, maybe he did try "steal" back his old stuff, but that is still very different from the major thefts perpetrated in the "Whitewater" scandals -- for which several people went to jail! OK, Hillary did manage not to get caught or prosecuted, but she was still involved and named as an "un-indicted co-conspirator".

Similarly, the apparent bribe attempt (suddenly boosting her new commodities account, by switching winnings out of other accounts) was never conclusively proven, but most people think it was an obvious attempt to bribe the Attorney General (Bill).

I am not aware of O.J attempting to steal anything other than stuff that once belonged to him. I agree that's wrong, but it's still not the same as stealing lots of money from strangers.

You asked about being more crooked.
I think Hillary wins, hands down.

Now, as to who wins in the murder department, this is less clear.
A jury did decide that O.J actually killed those two people.
So far, it remains only a suspicion that Hillary was involved in the murder of Vince Foster. So, as to whether or not Hillary is also a murderer, in addition to being a crook, I would have to say the jury is still out.

2007-09-22 22:06:30 · answer #4 · answered by bam 4 · 0 0

Hillary. O.J. was (and still is) a sports hero. He is much more honest. (Remember, what he was charged with in the first place --- death of his Ex --- was LEGAL not that long ago.)
Hillary is a smooth talker; most people do not pay attention to the words, just the smooth flow of words. Hillary claims to be on the side of the middle class (the poor are not even important enough to be appealed to), yet all she wants to do is raise taxes (health care! I definitely can not afford the taxes for it nor the insurance).
I would not say Hillary is smarter; just "slicker".

2007-09-18 14:46:28 · answer #5 · answered by Nothingusefullearnedinschool 7 · 0 0

OJ is definitely more crooked than Hillary! Anyone that is able to get away with murder is definitely crooked beyond recognition! I like and respect Hillary, as far as OJ is concerned he's gotta pay for all the harm he's caused in so many people's lives. He is definitely a son of a B?????!!! Can't stand him, Hillary and him have no comparision!

2007-09-18 14:44:40 · answer #6 · answered by veronica h 3 · 0 0

I believe they are equal in the sense that Hillary is married to a pathetic liar. Do you want yet ANOTHER Clinton in the White House. Protect the interns!! lmaoooo

2007-09-23 16:23:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

O.J. was aquitted of the murder charges, as for this current wrap, don't know any of the facts yet, so I will have to go with Hillary, at least I know all the facts about her.

2007-09-18 14:46:59 · answer #8 · answered by Greg 7 · 0 0

Dick Cheney, Tom Delay, Alberto Gonzalez. They have done a lot more damage to this country than anybody else in recent history. By the way, the South has a long history of wrongly convicting African-Americans who were then given the death penalty. OJ's acquital, therefore, was hardly the first case of injustice in the country's judicial system.

2007-09-18 14:46:36 · answer #9 · answered by hansblix222 7 · 1 1

Hillary she destoried the DNC's majority in Congress with her health care plan and thinks it will be better next time around.

2007-09-18 14:44:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

O man leave the crooks and find a reasonable one , if you Americans got , it is really necessary at this point of time,

2007-09-25 17:08:50 · answer #11 · answered by ? 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers