Do you think OJ and his lawyers will play the race card again?

Answer 1

While it does seem that OJ thinks he is above the law
we must remember.
- He was aquitted by a jury of his peers
- he is not indited or on trial YET
- and is guilty before being proven so

The system was designed by those who aquitted him.

Look past your anger and know that evenyone deserves a fair trial.

And he did not play the race card before. He had a team of awsome lawyers who fought tooth and nail for him...because he paid them to.

Most of you dont even know what the race card is. it seems everytime a minority complains of injustice, that is thrown at US.

Please use reason.

Answer 2

OJ is small potatoes compared to the sorry state of affairs in the rest of the world.

Lock his sorry @ss up and throw away the key. He's not worth the dirt on the bottom of my shoe.

What a sad state we are in to think that this is even news worthy. Shame on the media.

Answer 3

nicely he's stable approximately that one. i'm able to inform you that the Germans in no way had very many black human beings of their u . s . a .. interior the 1880s on the subject of the only negroes they ever observed have been from the yankee military bases like Lahr. France had the North Africans and individuals from their African colonies, Italy had the Ethiopians and Algerian immigrants, yet Germany had in no way had that. For years the Germans might merely assume a guy or woman grow to be from u . s . in the event that they have been black. anyhow, he gave an extraordinarily stable speach asking for German help in reducing Afghanistan and Pakistan to customer states back.

Answer 4

Attempting to resolve a property dispute with a gun is frequently depicted as a crime. Race is an irrelevant issue in a hotel room or on the street.

Answer 5

It's going to be hard to do because there were white guys in this with him. But I still think he may slip off the hook. I've been privately being OJ's Defence Attorney (purely as a legal exercise, of course lol), and the first thing I am going to attack is the issue of these incriminating audio tapes. How did it just happen that somebody went into that room "wired for sound?" It suggests like some kind of planned set-up doesn't it? One of the men also is responsible for having "tipped OJ off" that some guys were going to be in a certain hotel room with a collection of his old memorabilia, preparing to do a deal with other guys over the sale of it. Can I present a defence based on the arguement that OJ was lured to the location by this information, for a "sting operation" intended to recover his stuff..... but that the real sting was set up by others to get, not the memorabilia dealers, but OJ himself? I think I would work that angle as his attorney, because for one thing I have only to create "reasonable doubt" in the minds of a jury - and the known fact that none of the other guys involved in this on either side, appears to be of exactly saintly character.

Having said all that, of course, as his attorney, what am I up against on the other side of the coin? OJ is intelligent enough of a man to know that if there's a situation in which you genuinely believe a bunch of guys have illegally got their hands on your stuff and are all set to fence it, you go to the police and alert them what's going down. You do NOT set up and execute your own "sting operation".
The other thing is that OJ is fully aware of the fact that he is under a 30 something million dollar judgement against him on the civil trial that found him responsible for the deaths of two people 14 years ago. He has at this time paid absolutely zilch against that judgement, and if he knew, or believed that his legitimate property was about to be fenced for a significant amount of money, he also knew that the items themselves and their monetary value didn't belong to him, but to the Goldman Family. Therefore, he was acting illegally in attempting to take personal possession of them without duly informing the authorities.

The best I think I can do for OJ as his attorney is plead that the whole thing be thrown out of court because he himself was the victim of a scheme of entrapment, and that those who entered into this scheme against him are guiltier than he is by reason of the fact that they were the instigators of this illegal operation. As a lawyer, of course, I want to gain kudos by winning my case, especially one that will bring me fame and notoriety (and as a result, fortune lol). But in reality, I think I have a sheer rockface to climb and only some very slender handholds. I will need a few incredibly lucky breaks to give me a better purchase on the task, and perhaps an exceptionally neutral judge with a powerful sense of need to see all eyes dotted and T's crossed.

The construction of the jury, of course, will be the ultimate make-or-break factor. Last time around "The Juice" was incredibly lucky with a jury who had absolutely no intention of finding him guilty even if somebody had produced video footage of him in the very act of committing the two horrendous murders. It was the absolute textbook depiction of what is legally termed "jury nullification" in which the members of the jury, as a body, decide to reject all evidence and all arguments, and make their own verdict decision. This time, we are not in California, we're in Vegas. Different ball of wax, and very likely a different jury make-up.

Right now, as for my chances of becoming an overnight success as the next Johnny Cochran with a resounding win.... well, I'm not planning to go shopping for that 110 foot ocean-going yacht LOLOL> But what would I call that boat? How about "The Devil's Luck"?

Answer 6

It's much more likely than O.J. having an epiphany and admitting that he broke the law.

Answer 7

I can only hope so. I'd like to see it played so much that it wears itself out and can't be used again.

Answer 8

Worked the first time -- if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Damn KKK Vegas cops

"If the goods were stolen, then I was bowlin' "

Answer 9

yea i do plus the glove didnt fit last time!

Answer 10

oh yes