Depending on who else you have, probably not yet. Marshawn Lynch will probably sell for much more in a couple weeks when his schedule clears up.
2007-09-18 07:05:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Rob Stancliffe 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would make the trade. While Lynch is the number back in Buffalo and Maroney is still splitting time it may seem like a bad move, but Maroney is a proven player on an explosive offensive, while Lynch is unproven and not playing in the best system. Clayton for Evans is a no-brainer. The small trade off between Lynch and Maroney is outweighed by the Clayton-Evans portion of the deal. I'd accept this one in a heartbeat.
2007-09-18 08:23:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Pat K 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would say yes. I know the numbers are jaded right now and Clayton and Lynch look really good after 2 weeks. But i think long term Maroney and Evans are the way to go. Evans is a huge play guy for the bills and they havent been able to find him regularly yet, but they will. And Maroney is slowly workiing into his role and i think the pats are just trying to limit his carries early so he makes it the whole year. In the next 3-4 weeks he will blow up with a 150 yd day to show everyone he is a threat and you have to defend the run. That will happen right before they play the Colts.
2007-09-18 07:55:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lovely3800 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, I'd take Evans/Maroney over Lynch/Clayton. Lynch's schedule's brutal, he doesn't have enough talent around him (especially in that dinged up defense), to get the carries needed to outproduce Maroney. Evans, a long ball catcher, doesn't rely so much on the talent around him - and a bad D actually increases the likelihood they'll be playing from behind and throwing the ball more. Clayton's alright, but he doesn't have the track record Evans does. And, Maroney should stay fresher precisely because he's getting less carries. It's a fair enough trade, but I'd rather have Evans and Maroney.
-Regards
2007-09-18 07:21:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by dishnivels 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lynch is the lone back at BUF and Maroney shares time. But Maroney is just a better RB. He may split carries but he will get the lions share in a potent offense.
Evans is def a better fantasy WR than Clayton considering the uncertanty of BAL's QB.
So heck ya, make the trade.
2007-09-18 07:11:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by lukeandchristy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm uncertain i'm able to take this question heavily. Charlie Frye isnt even a commencing QB anymore, he grow to be traded to Seattle. JJ Arrington isnt commencing the two in the back of part. Stephen Jackson had 2 fumbles because of the fact he did no longer play a lot interior the pre season and is in an offence based around him getting 30-35 touches a interest. Marshawn Lynch is gonna get Offensive rookie of the 300 and sixty 5 days attention....this one is a no brainer.
2016-10-19 00:16:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here's what you do:
Make the trade, get Lee Evans, use him this week when he gets his home run game that he's scheduled for, then turn around and trade him again afterwards because he'll be cold for the rest of the season.
2007-09-18 08:19:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Southpaw 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Evans is so hot and cold its pathetic. You might hit a gusher one week and then cry the next. I'd sit tight\
2007-09-18 07:25:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mr. Cellophane 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
simple answer- YES
2007-09-22 02:28:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by novajedes 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
TRADE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-09-18 09:18:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Timeflo 4
·
0⤊
0⤋