2007-09-18 06:22:27 · 11 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Dan Rather has it and prove that it was forged mr. neocon
2007-09-18 06:29:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
that is marvelous the lengths the wingers will circulate to cajole themselves(by using fact they comprehend no liberals purchase this b.s.)that the war in Iraq is a valid protection against a danger and in retaliation for 9/11. Pitiful.Pathetic.Moronic.
2016-12-26 16:49:42 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL, yes the doc was forged.
And yes Joe Wilson testified that Iraq was indeed looking for Uranium in Niger.
And yes President Bush told the truth when he stated that "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."
Just one of a MYRIAD of reasons to go into Iraq.
Incapable of MOVING ON?
2007-09-18 06:30:25 · answer #3 · answered by Private Deek 2 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Smuggling of yellow cake was and still is going on in the Congo.
Anybody who believes it is a myth will wake up one morning and find a mushroom cloud on TV just like planes flying into the World Trade Center.
2007-09-18 06:32:46 · answer #4 · answered by RomeoMike 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
They changed a q to a n in the latest iteration :)
2007-09-18 06:29:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Not quite yet. Why don't you go over and lend them a hand?
2007-09-18 07:09:25 · answer #6 · answered by rduke88 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
As the Bushies like to say 'NO ONE COULD HAVE PREDICTED' that things would go so badly.
In other words, LIBERALS predicted it would go badly.
2007-09-18 06:29:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Did they use the same word processor that Dan Rather used for his forgery?
2007-09-18 06:26:39 · answer #8 · answered by Lavrenti Beria 6 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Not quite yet. We'll wake you.
.
2007-09-18 06:29:06 · answer #9 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
as usual, your question assumes facts not in evidence.
2007-09-18 06:29:00 · answer #10 · answered by karl k 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋