English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-09-18 06:07:14 · 12 answers · asked by Kelly B 4 in Politics & Government Politics

The Dow was in the 11,000 in 2000.
In 2007 we reached 14,000.

2007-09-18 06:11:26 · update #1

12 answers

Yes. Different areas of the economy would be strong. However, oil and defense related industries would probably not be doing as well....

2007-09-18 06:11:51 · answer #1 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 2 0

Kelly , this one is too easy to pass up . Whenever Achmadinejad or any other Middle East wacko even says something belligerent , the stock market reacts NEGATIVELY . Not positively . Oil is the only stock that increases and Iran is the beneficiary .
Sometimes I miss the mark too Kelly . Try again . Good luck .

2007-09-18 06:17:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Sure. The Dow went from 1000 to 10,000 between Vietnam and the Gulf War, so why could it not grow without a war?

2007-09-18 06:13:01 · answer #3 · answered by Dave_Stark 7 · 1 0

I have to agree with Private Deek. Our economy would have been far more stable if we'd never gone to war. President Bush is a business man above all, and if you research the strides he made while governer of Texas, you'll see how I formed my opinion. However, with other issues at the front of the table, the nation's economy took a back seat.

2007-09-18 06:31:34 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

you are able to connect the Marines and yet no longer help the conflict in the midsection East. You stated you may do what you have been informed to do. it somewhat is all we ask. in case you won't be in a position to do as informed to do - do no longer connect or if in, get out whilst the enlistment is up. I help the conflict in concept yet in prepare, it somewhat is going to by no ability end. it somewhat is not any longer against a protection tension of yet another u . s . a ....it rather is against non secular zealots who're in actuality like the Viet Cong - you do no longer be conscious of who to have faith or no longer because of the fact that they do no longer positioned on a uniform like we do. the belief improve into stable to do away with Saddam, however the consequence improve into never nicely concept approximately. I nevertheless help us being there (who else could have performed it) yet I say that we made extensive mistake by ability of no longer thinking this out a jointly as longer. I help the troops (having served 22 years), yet i'm able to useful see why you question having to pass there. you will pass and do your duty, i'm useful; 2 or 3 or 5 cases, in case you reside in that long. you're easily unfastened to disagree. it somewhat is america. i wouldn't accept as true with you, yet i will preserve to demise your suitable to disagree. that's what u.s. is supposedly approximately.

2017-01-02 08:33:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yes if the money invested in the war went into businesses it would be a lot higher than now.

2007-09-18 06:12:30 · answer #6 · answered by Edge Caliber 6 · 0 1

yes

2007-09-18 06:12:20 · answer #7 · answered by PNAC ~ Penelope 4 · 1 0

Yes,.. In different sectors, but yes...

2007-09-18 06:10:38 · answer #8 · answered by outcrop 5 · 1 0

Yes, it has done so before.

2007-09-18 06:10:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Probably would have been MUCH higher.

2007-09-18 06:10:26 · answer #10 · answered by Private Deek 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers