People are mad because they think he was the killer...
Why are you mad at him???
Shouldn't you be mad at the jury that were the ones that voted and not at OJ???
2007-09-18 05:20:53 · 18 answers · asked by Con4Life 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I'm not mad at O.J. I couldn't care less really. It doesn't affect me. I have heard both sides. I don't know if he did it or not. It certainly looks like he did but there is doubt. So maybe he hired the best attorneys and they did their job well. It seems like people are happy that he may go to jail after all. I still don't care. There are more important issues than just one person.
2007-09-18 05:27:46 · answer #1 · answered by Unsub29 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
OJ is a waste of dermis. He have been given away with homicide through fact of evidence that replaced into tampered with. The jury ought to no longer come via with a accountable evidence in the event that they could no longer have confidence the evidence and be a hundred% beneficial it pointed to him. Thank the crooked people who tampered with the evidence interior the 1st place. if that they had left it on my own, i'm beneficial he might have been got here upon accountable. i'm no longer mad at him. i do no longer possibly care one whit approximately him different than hoping that this time he will do intense long term prison time despite if this is for stealing stupid activities memorabilia. there'll be some variety of justice served interior the tip besides.
2016-10-09 09:58:59 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are right.. and I think most people would agree, that jury was biased and doing a little payback for offences against black accused. However, i am not mad at OJ, I would just like to see him face some jail time for anything.. he should be in jail for life.. but I will take whatever.
2007-09-18 05:44:41 · answer #3 · answered by Debra H 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
we should be disappointed with the jurys conclusion.
we should be upset at the legal process that would not allow the blood samples of OJ's found at scene and the blood samples of Nichole found in O J's car and home, into testamony----(thanks ito)
we should be mad as hell at O J for killing to fine people
we should hope that his Gangsta activities in Las Vegas put him away for many years
anyone that has a doubt about O J's innocence or guilt should read Charles Dardin's book regarding the matter and you will be peaved too. The evidence NOT ALLOWED was overwhelming and proof positive that he is the killer !!
2007-09-18 05:28:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
He married a blond bimbo. She and that Goldman twit were into drugs and got killed for it. The crooked racist cops tried to pin it on OJ because he's a black guy with money. The jury saw through that BS and let him go. That po'd the establishment so they are after his butt along with that pathetic money grubber Goldman guy. And the drug meanies got off scot free.
2007-09-18 12:42:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Excuse me, tangerine...he was acquitted in criminal court yes. But let's not forget that he was held criminally responsable for the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman in the ensuing civil suit. Kind of a contradictory ruling for an innocent man, would'nt you say? Maybe that's because he really IS guilty.
Just a thought.
You're basing your assumptions on the fact that the system works. If that were true, OJ would be in jail and Bush would not currently be president.
2007-09-18 05:53:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
No, actually we should be mad at the two prosecutors, Clark & Darden, and the judge, Ito, because they made that trial all about them instead of the victims and the killer. OJ is an abomination and he's breathing perfectly good air that other people could be breathing.
2007-09-18 05:27:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
I'm not mad at OJ. I just think he is so dumb to still be doing things to keep him in the lime light eventhough he knows people hate him!
2007-09-18 05:30:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
1. He got away with murder.
2. He used the race card to get away with murder.
3. Using the race card he seriously hurt race relations in this country.
I am severly dissappointed wit hthe jury, but racism is everywhere. Yes, releasing someone because of race is JUST as bad as convicting because of race.
2007-09-18 05:28:30 · answer #9 · answered by Jeff Engr 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
If anyone paid any attention to that case and has doubt they have to be an idiot. I am not mad at him I just think he should be 6 ft under.
2007-09-18 05:30:16 · answer #10 · answered by Bob J 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋