Why is it when the liberal fringe of our society is vocal, burns flags, marches on Washington?

Question

denegrates authority and is in your face with their opinion, it's called their right under the constitution and they are doing it to further their agenda and it's their right as an American, no matter how rude or arrogant or in your face they are, but when the Silent Majority fights back in the same manner, the Silent Majority is looked upon as divisive, war mongering, hateful and bigoted?

Just an observation, so please keep your comments above board, all you wannabe activists out there.

The first batch of answers is missing the gist of the question. We all obviously have the right to voice our opinion. The question stands is -- as you may see in some responses -- when the lib fringe does it, it is viewed upon as their right (which it it) BUT when the Silent Majority does the same thing, the Silen Majority is accused of being hateful, divisive, etc.?
Nice try, to all you libs who missed the mark, as usual, in answering the question posed, as opposed to posturing your own opinions to a question that was never asked. Keep up the good work.

Answer 1

THE LEFT DOESN'T LIKE IT WHEN PEOPLE HAVE OPPOSING IDEAS. JUST LOOK AT HOW THEY CONTINUALLY ATTACK FOX NEWS, THE LIBERALS IN CONGRESS FAVOR THE ALLEGED FAIRNESS DOCTRINE TO SILENCE CONSERVATIVE TALK RADIO SINCE NOBODY LISTENS TO AIR AMERICA,

Answer 2

Perhaps it is because their biggest cause would be to shut Conservatives up so they can have big government run their lives! Fine, if that's what they want but why thrust those values on Conservatives? The silent majority will prevail through truth and consistency. Conservatives do not want Hillary's Socialistic government or health care plan. The plan, as everything else, would be government controlled and was proposed in the early 90's. With a cost of over 100 billion $$ a year. Who will pay for it? Who will it really benefit? Substance abusers, the homeless? Why would you choose to pay for something without having a choice? There already are plans for those physically and mentally disabled, and the elderly. Have they taken the time to look at the other health care plan? The newer proposals for all should be looked at and compared instead of just looking in one direction.
So, I guess the difference would be that we are able to get a point across without being destructive or violent.
Inferences made regarding extremists on both sides is ridiculous.

Answer 3

Not a question, so no definitive answer is possible. You are obviously a Limbaugh Lamb, so your "question" is of dubious intent and of little substantive value. You make inflammatory and false generalizations such as, "burn flags", "wannabe activists". And you make delusional assertions about the majority and minority, the 2006 elections should have given you a clue, guess you were tuned out, so the 2008 elections should provide you with a much needed dose of reality. It's too bad that you and so many of your "type" are so blind, clueless, uninformed and lacking the basic functions required to perceive and accept the reality of what is and will be happening in the future. If you were to travel, read and absorb different sources of information you may(?) begin to get a grip on the real world. Good Luck!

Edit- What question??? It looks like YOU missed the mark ( completely typical and ignorant) when in basic English or composition class. If your delusional mind thinks you posed a question have it reviewed by a competent English language expert. It is incomplete, rambling and very nebulous. Judge yourself BEFORE you judge others. You have other needs you should be attending to first.

Answer 4

The libral fringe will argue that they are doing it for all of those that cannot speak for themselves (elderly, poor, children). If the conservatives do it, they are forcing God on society and not allowing the public to make their own choices. The liberals all feel that the conservatives are only "rich and make ourselves richer, to hell with the others." As far as liberals are concerned the conservatives should not have rights under the constitution. The media helps that viewpoint along. And sadly there are many out there that cannot formulate an opinion on ANYTHING without media input.

Answer 5

It is a First Amendment right for such "liberal" activists along with the "silent majority" you invoke. However, no one has any obligation to actuall agree with or even take seriously another's opinion. I

Answer 6

Hello,
Reality check here. It is called exercising civil liberties. In particular, the 1st Amendment of the Constitution, the right to free speech.

Everyone, regardless of the opinion is responsible for the words they use.

Answer 7

Exsqueeze me, but what about the KKK, the Neo Nazis, and the crazy abortions people with the cut up baby signs?

For total crazyness, it's now 1 to 1. The religious crazy conservative right has blow up the Oklahoma Fed building, and the left wing super pot head liberals have blown up the University building in Wisconsin. So, who will snap next?!?!

Answer 8

The left are clear narcissist and they have 3 tactics
1. to try and gain you on their side.
2. then to attack when 1 did not work
3. they play the victim
It all boils down to they matter and no one else does in their minds and people need to wake up and face them off as when confronted they do not know what to do. And let their sick attacks of political correctness to silence you fly by and attack them harder and never let up.

OK Commies come and get me for exposing you.

Answer 9

Maybe the silent majority needs to get out there and let their voices be heard! You want change..........Speak up! You have just as many rights as anyone else....if you truly believe in what you are saying....you can handle the rejection!

Answer 10

You'd rather they all just shut up? Enjoy your voting rights? Someone not very well behaved did that for you a long time ago.