They're two years old....not many kids of that age would be able to give an account of what happened, even if they were awake at the time.
2007-09-18 00:55:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by chip2001 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
You obviously missed out the news yesterday morning on Sky News. They were, indeed, both interviewed by Trevor McDonald during the making of yesterday TV program but the interview was edited out of the program. Sir Richard Branson demanded it.
Seriousoy, though, I wonder if their testimony would be admissible in court. All other Evidence seems to have been rulled out, LOL !! Yes, there is DNA evidence... ahhh but not good enough. Sniffer dogs evidence ? Hmmmm not to be relied upon. Body fluids of the girl found under the boot carpet... Hmmmm that 's a tough one....Let's just not comment on it at all and hope the populations of the world are stupid, LOL !!!
I think we should start thinking about admitting the testimony of those 1 yr old twins -- after all an average advocate could make those babes say anything.
2007-09-18 07:47:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by RED-CHROME 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well they slept through the entire ordeal according to the parents and I doubt they could put together a complete sentence at that age. Even if they were a little older still..that could be tramatizing for them.
2007-09-18 09:40:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ladybugs77 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You only have to look at Ricky P's answer to see the mentality of some people and he got given a thumbs up.
Why are some people condoning this?
edit: how are people meant to be taken seriously on YA when there are people like that who will give a retort or a thumbs up for the sake of it.
2007-09-18 07:53:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
The twins are only just able to walk,,,,,they probably can`t even remember two weeks ago let alone several months,,,,and you wouldn`t get much of a coherent answer from a 2 year old
2007-09-18 07:43:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by McCanns are guilty 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Whatever they said couldnt be used in court anyway, because they are under the age of 11.
2007-09-18 07:51:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by forgetmenot1908 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Im not sure what age they are but they are barely old enough to talk yet never mind ask questions
2007-09-18 07:50:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
They're too young, plus they slept through the whole thing and the ensuing panic afterwards (so someone who read it said to someone else who told me)
2007-09-18 07:45:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by snaffle 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm sure they have asked the children but unfortunately 2 year olds tend not to be very accommodating, also i believe they were asleep. xxx
2007-09-18 07:44:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by louise 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't think it's fair to put them through that, it's enough that their big sister went missing. I believed that they were situated in different rooms although correct me if I'm wrong
2007-09-18 07:43:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Scatty 6
·
1⤊
1⤋