I think no one died because President Clinton lied about "SEX" not weapons of mass destruction that has seen the deaths of many people......................idiot
2007-09-18 00:32:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by joyce s 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
You forgot lies like Bush's excuse for starting the war with Iraq:
"Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud." -George Bush
Also, the lie about America being greeted as liberators.
2007-09-18 08:17:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Maggie Thatcher, prime minister of Britain, provoked a war with Argentina over the Falklands so that she could win an election. Golda Meir was no pacifist. Etc. etc. The reason why people may think women leaders will be peaceful leaders is simple -- there have been so few of them in the past.
2007-09-18 07:32:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Norm 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
I think history supports your claim going way back to Boadicea, Elizabeth 1 and Queen Victoria etc. etc. I still think a woman would be less inclined to go to war before at least studying the alternatives.
2007-09-18 08:35:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ted T 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
We already have the biggest war over a lie, and it belongs to George Bush. I know why you are upset. They are going to shut off corporate welfare, for the most part pretty soon.
Over 1/2 of America cheats! Which 50% do you belong in?
Want to compare Democrats with Republicans, besides all the BS hype?
http://www.uuforum.org/deficit.htm
Of course most of it went into George Bush and friends pockets!
Republicans seem to have a hard time managing money, unlike Democrats!
2007-09-18 07:35:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by cantcu 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
If people think we can always just "talk things out", they're out of their minds. There have been civilizations that have practiced this in the past. There is a reason why they are not in existance today.
2007-09-18 07:39:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
She said, "If MOTHERS ruled the world." Though it doesn't surprise me that you can't even get that right.
2007-09-18 08:05:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Monk 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
No there would just be endless skirmishes, many for no apparent or particular reason
2007-09-18 07:51:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by booboo 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
eh, it's just Hollywood empty rhetoric
2007-09-18 07:44:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mark A 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Exactly.
2007-09-18 07:27:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋