English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Nationalized healthcare is a horrible idea! Look at canada...sure everyone will have healthcare...but people will have to wait to get any care from a doctor.

I would say that I would love for nationalized healthcare to get instated just to show the world how dumb the democrats in power are...but once we have nationalized healthcare, we will never go back to a normal working healthcare system.

Will someone explain to me why Hillary is bent on nationalized healthcare?

2007-09-18 00:15:09 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

It is a Great Escape, everyone has forgotten that she evaded questions about the role of morons.org.

Her media people had to come-up with something quick to keep us all busy and divert our attention from her illegal campaign contributions, and support of a group defaming our great Army.

Her so call universal health care will force a small business like mine to contribute even though I am the only employee.

This is a very Bad Idea. Very Bad.

2007-09-18 01:41:59 · answer #1 · answered by Thomas B 5 · 1 0

I don't like Billary but nationalized healthcare would make sure people have health insurance , I guess to some people that is good. Most civilized countries have it. Canada is only 1 example, poor people die earlier than wealthy people because they cannot get preventative healthcare and typically wait till a disease diabetes, cancers etc. are way out of control before they can get medical attention. There is a definite need for it in this country but knowing how horrified it makes people with $$$, I doubt it will ever be instituted. In America the neocons and cons only believe in people paying for their own healthcare, so basically they believe if you don't have $$ for medical care, tough cheese

Don't get your shorts in a knot as I'm sure it will never happen

2007-09-18 00:29:01 · answer #2 · answered by magpie 6 · 0 0

"Just to show the world how dumb the democrats are" ??

The rest of the industrialized world has nationalized healthcare. The rest of the world cant believe how dumb the repubicans are.

The idea is really no different than the concept of insurance. The only difference is we would no longer have private profiteers getting profit when you are sick or injured, or deciding what procedures they will pay for and what they wont. So if you really hate the "group" healthcare concept, cancel your insurance and go it alone, cowboy.

2007-09-18 01:06:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Hillary Clinton took money from the Medical Industry to shut down national health care in the past. I think that National Health Care is a great idea, but Hillary is not.

2007-09-18 00:20:59 · answer #4 · answered by Darth Vader 6 · 0 0

Her health care plan is not run by the government so don't try and pull that BS!

You mean your working health care system that lets a woman bleed to death for 45 minutes on an emergency room floor, or hospitals practices of dumping patients in the ghetto with catheters still attached and in hospital clothing.

I bet the part you don't like is all the HMO president and their hierarchy often make more than $20 Million a year while denying people needed services.

Maybe you are talking about the fact that even with OUR GREAT health care system we are only 1 country above Cuba in Life Expectancy and lower than everyone in Europe, or are you talking about we are a country with more neonatologists than any other, but the morbidity and mortality of children is almost dead LAST!

Some record! All you care about is getting rich off of others!

2007-09-18 00:28:59 · answer #5 · answered by cantcu 7 · 1 1

She is as serious as the driver of a car bomb in a crowded market place. By doing this she took away any serious hope of criticizing Bush on his high domestic social spending. I wonder about the timing. It gives her critics plenty of time to ask too many questions about the true cost of the program and how it will operate. I would have thought she would have waited until at least late Oct or Nov before dropping this out there.

2007-09-18 00:24:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i'm a Democrat, and if Hillary wins the nomination particularly, i will help her. "particularly" is the significant be conscious in that sentence. i do in contrast to three issues i've got seen from her so a methods. Her campaign has been attempting to assert that Michigan replaced right into a honest often happening and its outcomes could stand and those delegates could be seated. It very for sure replaced into no longer a honest often happening -- Obama's call wasn't even on the poll. i replaced into easily comfortable with the Florida outcomes status as is, yet no longer the Michigan outcomes. I additionally do in contrast to that i've got heard implications two times now from her camp (as quickly as from a surrogate and as quickly as as we talk from Hillary) that they could be attempting to get Obama's PLEDGED delegates to alter their minds. those human beings represent the will of voters different than themselves, and despite if there is not any rule asserting they might't exchange their minds, ethically they might desire to no longer. i do no longer purely like the belief of people taking advantage of a technicality to do something it quite is unethical. My husband is neither Democrat nor Republican, yet he helps Obama. If Obama does not win the nomination, he won't be balloting for Clinton. i think of there are a number of Obama supporters like me who might help Clinton, and there are a number of Obama supporters like my husband who does not help her.

2016-10-09 09:44:23 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

You might want to read past the headlines. Nobody has proposed the kind of changes you're afraid of. Mrs. Clinton's plan actually seems more modest than Mr. Edwards'. While you're looking at Canada, you might also look at Germany and Switzerland, and you might also consider that all those countries have much healthier people than we do, for substantially smaller insurance bills.

2007-09-18 00:35:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Just go see "Sicko" by whom you would describe as a Commie Muslim-hugging socialist -- Michael Moore. Then take a trip next door to Canada and ask people there if they would trade their commie health care system for the one in the U.S. You may be surprised at their answer.

2007-09-18 00:28:00 · answer #9 · answered by Norm 3 · 0 1

Look at her plan. All it calls for is for everyone to HAVE to buy health insurance, not that the government will provide. The government will help subsidize people who have a low income.

2007-09-18 00:27:23 · answer #10 · answered by Chris 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers