should Indai give up its nuclear weapons and use the money for the developement of the country?

Question

answer with valid points

Answer 1

It depends partly on how much the nuclear program cost as a fraction of government expenditures and what benefits could be obtained if the money were spent on other things or just not collected in taxes. The other half of the equation is evaluation the threat that Pakistan Nuclear program actually poses and the extent the threat is actually diminish by India's weapons. I suspect that the optimum result would be to keep the existing weapons but not spend for further development and expansion. Pakistan has few good targets and the ability to destroy those should act as a sufficient deterrent against a nuclear attack on India.

Answer 2

without a wall, door ,lock and security how a house is exit
do you know how money is wasted by politician
they give them self A to Z catagory security
they give themsel higher salary and allowance,
and pensios for life for a 5 year term
they waste lot of money in the adversiment for their
still born project.
the court never care this.
they give lengthy judgment for killing a deer, while the 10
person brutally murdered in day time, and the police throw
their bodies in the river,- un noticed.
how can we save our country.



.

Answer 3

no al khida first attacked India, terrorists attacked the Indian Parliament they came from Pakistan
Pakistan has attacked Indian territory
Islam is an expansionist religion and India is the world's second biggest Islamic country even though Muslims are a monirity