I did.
Not because I wanted to show any bias for or against but because i believe this program was totally bias in its presentation.
It did not show an even ubias assessment of the forensic evidence. I believe this programme would prejudice any possible trial, making the programme illegal in itself.
If you want a media you can trust and rely on to give he facts and not interfer with the process of law you need to complain to ITV now to protect standards of boroadcasting now.
I also believe that Micheal Grade has a lot to do with the undermining of broadcasting standards. The Telephone quiz problems started at the BBC when he was in control and continued at ITV as he became Chairman there.
2007-09-17 21:09:37 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Terminator i was complaining about the reporting in the proramme and state again this not an opinion for or against.
So next time you want to make a constructive addition make sure your head is our of your @rse first.
2007-09-17 21:34:56 · update #1
I didn't waste my time watching it in the first place
2007-09-17 21:17:28 · answer #1 · answered by ChocLover 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately (or fortunately depending on how you look at it) I didn't watch it but I agree you should complain if you found it completely bias (whatever your beliefs). I personally think it was inappropriate to make and broadcast such a programme at this point in time. Programmes like this (and I'm sure there'll be many more) should be broadcast after the investigation is completed and serious care should be taken to avoid bias either way.
2007-09-17 21:34:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i watched the documentry, i have always supported the mccanns and will until there is evidence to prove otherwise ....it is fine to have a opinion on ,is it right to leave your children alone ????or not , HAVE YOU ? or would you ?? but there are to many people being the judge , jury and executioner........until we have FACTS !!! speculation is wrong !!!, cruel ,hurtful and quite frankly no help to this ongoing case ....on finding out what happened to a innocent child of just 4 years old .....
2016-05-17 11:27:45 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that somebody had to stand up and present the "against" from the McCann side.
After all, the same could be said for the Portuguese press and all the biased reporting that they have done.
6 of one, half a dozen of the other.
You can't have your cake and eat it.
2007-09-17 22:44:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
i didnt watch it so dont know what your talking about, but if you take TV or broadcasting that seriously, you need to get a life.
And as for your example about the phone in quizzes, everyone got what they deserved, if they hadn't been so bloody greedy staying up till 3am to win cash, they wouldnt have been robbed, i hope they never get their money back LMAO LMAO LMAO im rich your not, i didnt get conned ha ha...oh
what was the question again???
2007-09-17 21:21:21 · answer #5 · answered by Humza 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
There should be a police investigation into how they got hold of any evidence let alone aired it - it is all sub judice!!!
It is just idle ill informed speculation!!!!
2007-09-17 21:35:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Wanted to watch it but couldnt is there a link so I could watch it?
2007-09-17 21:15:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Um...did you complain when the media released unreliable leaks that the DNA was conclusive, when it wasn't?
A rhethorical question can be viewed as an answer...
2007-09-17 21:16:14 · answer #8 · answered by Faith 6 · 4⤊ 5⤋
No I didn't but it goes to show that some people have to much time on their hands if they have nothing better to do than put in a complaint.
Innocent until proven guilty
2007-09-17 21:18:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 6⤋
When they are convicted of murder, you'll regret you did!!!!
2007-09-17 21:15:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋