The murder conviction is off the table. O.J. was acquitted and can't be tried again--even if he confesses to doing it.
But what do you think? Did he kill his wife and her friend? Is he a sociopath who only cares about himself? Or did the police frame him and is he now being persecuted? Or did he just happen to be the poor guy caught in the middle who didn't do anything but gets blamed for everything? What do you think?
(The current burglary and armed robbery charges in Las Vegas could send him up the river for more than 100 years if he's convicted.)
2007-09-17 19:49:33 · 13 answers · asked by Warren D 7 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
MacSteed, we'll put you down as "undecided." lol
So far the majority of this jury seems to be going against "Juice."
2007-09-17 21:15:15 · update #1
Simpson is a sociopath, a misogynist, a liar and a murderer. He butchered his ex-wife and the unfortunate Ron Goldman who stumbled upon the scene. There is ample supporting evidence (including copious DNA blood evidence) to reach this conclusion and no amount of playing the race card and/or indicting the LA police department as criminally corrupt is ever going to change the facts of the case.
It is critically important to view Simpson in the proper light and not to regard him as a "victim" (which is deeply offensive to the real victims and their families) or a "poor guy caught in the middle." Simpson is a hot-tempered, violent and narcissistic sociopath with delusions of grandeur. His years of celebrity led him to believe himself invincible and above the law. His unjust acquittal only served to heighten his grotesque sense of his own importance.
The best thing about the present case against him is that there is damning evidence, including eyewitnesses and an audiotape recording the events as they happened. He no longer has the money for the high-powered attorneys who saved his sorry *** last time around and I very much doubt we'll see another case of jury nullification based upon blatant racism.
In other words, Simpson is guilty (again) and this time he is actually going to pay for his crimes. I hope he never tastes freedom again and dies a bitter, lonely old wretch in the deepest, darkest hole of a prison that can be found. Karmic justice will then be served.
2007-09-17 20:55:00 · answer #1 · answered by MacSteed 7 · 20⤊ 1⤋
I think that Simpson is a sociopath who got so cocky after getting away with double-homocide that he feels himself to be untouchable now. Well, now the evidence of his actions are caught on tape, and there will be no "magic glove" to help him squirm his way out of this one! I hope that this time he receives his just desserts.
2007-09-18 01:21:46 · answer #2 · answered by Starr 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I think he is and always has been a sociopath. I think he killed his wife and friend, as well as burglarized and armed robbery in Vegas. I hope that they do take him off the streets and lock him up forever!!!
What goes on in Vegas, doesn't always stay in Vegas.
2007-09-18 06:06:26 · answer #3 · answered by Granny 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
In Nevada, for a everyday-time felon, wherer the legal is a risky crime like armed theft, the sentence is in many cases especially harsh. No physique gets probation for armed theft. that isn't authorised by state regulation. As to the abduction, I easily tend to agree that there grow to be in user-friendly terms a nominal kidnapping. that is meditated interior the sentencing shape chosen by the decide. BTW, a declare of perfect isn't a protection to theft. that is a criminal offense to apply tension to recuperate that which you declare belongs to you. you ought to use tension to non-deadly tension to ward off the theft, yet to no longer recuperate the products. subsequently, whether he incredibly believed that they have got been stolen (and not offered) the crime may well be a similar.
2016-10-18 23:17:21 · answer #4 · answered by joleen 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Most certainly, O.J. did it. The evidence was astounding. Iron-clad. The legal system is as it is. It suc*s. He is in hot water this time though. No Millions to pay for defense. He might have to settle for what you and I get. A FAIR trial!
2007-09-17 19:59:30 · answer #5 · answered by ToolManJobber 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
OJ is a sociopath who it seems cannot tell the truth if it killed him. (no pun intended) He makes some of the dumbest decisions.
p.s. Prior to the murders, I really liked OJ.
2007-09-17 20:05:07 · answer #6 · answered by CharJ, 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
He was caught in a bad situation in the case. Personally, the evidence didn't incriminate him. As in Van Wilder, if the glove don't fit, your full of sh__t. I do think he handled it wrong, going for a " cruise " in his bronco to moms house but, and I mean no offense, he's probably just an old football star pissed off that he can walk into a bar and no one could pick his face out and say anything about his career.
2007-09-17 19:58:53 · answer #7 · answered by Alex B 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋
The thing that should be on trial here is the juridical system, as far as I'm concerned OJ is Innocent and should be viewed as innocent,because a court of law found him not guilty, we have to respect that, he played by the rules and he won.
the killing here is irrelevant, so why he did it, is irrelevant as well.
Now everybody is playing dirty with him and since he walked free out that courtroom back in 94, they wanted some how to make out for the mistake they did, so they are out to get him..eventually they will do, but I'm sure it won't be a fair game.
2007-09-17 23:17:59 · answer #8 · answered by MoRmEx 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
OJ did it. Classic megalomaniac.
2007-09-18 08:55:36 · answer #9 · answered by bijou 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
self-absorbed megalomaniac with superiority complex.
2007-09-17 22:09:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋