English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Or that he blew up the Cole? Oh, right....I forgot, science will explain it. Is that the same kind of science that makes it possible for Santa Claus' sleigh to fly?

2007-09-17 15:54:07 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

13 answers

no, but bush DID sink the Titanic.

2007-09-17 16:08:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Clinton is another profiteer in The New World Order Game, and it is clear that party labels don't apply to the Clinton's. A more appropriate party name should come out from hiding in the shadows it is the New World Order Zionist Party which now wields way to much power in American life. 9/11 was an inside job but then so was the creation of the private Central Banks.

2007-09-17 23:16:56 · answer #2 · answered by Lynne L 2 · 1 1

No. But that's where the Bushites might have gotten the idea: make it look like a 'repeat' incident, only this time make certain the buildings get blown to smithereens so that:
a) The Bush administration can play on Americans' emotions to do whatever it wants in 'retaliation', even attack another sovereign nation that in no way threatened, provoked or attacked the United States;
b) Larry Silverstein can recoup his millions in losses from the insurance company;
c) A new prejudice against Muslims can be established, justifying the need for 'war' and control of Middle East oil fields. -RKO- 09/17/07

2007-09-17 23:13:08 · answer #3 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 3 3

Who knows? He may have been. I wouldn't put it past these people, after all it IS our CIA which created Bin Laden in the first place. Clinton's are just as bad as the Bush's.

2007-09-17 23:14:28 · answer #4 · answered by Fedup Veteran 6 · 1 0

actually I think bush didn't attack the trade center, he just either knew about it and let it happen or could have worked harder to prevent it (IE he was lazy and negligent).
I don't think the pentagon was attacked by terrorists.

I think Clinton either didn't get enough intel to protect us from the original attacks or didn't take the threats seriously
(but whether its bush or Clinton or whoever until the first attack actual happens there is a decent chance the people threatening you are lying or exaggerating)

2007-09-17 23:15:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

awsome look at how many people smell the 9/11-fish. that's way too many people to arrest...some folks are probably too scared to talk about it...so you can joke around but reguardless who is right we take 9/11 way more seriously than you do.

2007-09-17 23:06:13 · answer #6 · answered by T-monster 3 · 3 1

No, that also was bushy who as a stinky governor( or may be he was unemployed at the time and daddy used to pay his bills!) was so jealous at Mr. Clinton and tried to give him a bad name. GET IT!!!

2007-09-17 23:19:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6 1

Get real! Clinton may be a sleaze bag but he didn't do that.

2007-09-17 23:17:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Bill looks like a boy scout next to GWB

2007-09-17 23:08:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5 5

lmfao, they can prove that clinton didnt do any of that, just smell his cigars

2007-09-17 23:06:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers