English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If there were no guns in the country, there would be few gun murders.
Two - Some guns would be smuggled into the country, but MOST criminals would not have guns. It is much harder to kill people with knives or your hands.
Three - If you have a gun, you are more likely to be killed by a gun. The criminal has to protect himself from you. The criminal will usually catch you by surprise, and your gun will not protect you.
Four - Jesus Christ would never carry a gun. Don't tell me someone wants to argue that pointl. How can Christians pretend to follow Jesus and own guns?
Five - Jesus suggested turning the other cheek, not blasting the other person with a gun.
Six - Shooting someone with a gun is cowardly. Why do Christians want to be cowards?
Seven - The second amendment was written by a human who had some fears after the war with the British. Why should we want to live in fear today? A gun is like alcohol, false courage, because the criminal shoots first!

2007-09-17 15:09:32 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

3 answers

Some of your facts are wrong, like about criminals always shooting first. Lots of potential victims have shot their attackers or people that have broken into their house, taking the criminal by surprise because the criminal doesn't expect the good normal person to have a gun and use it. Also, I doubt fact 3 is correct, about being more likely to be killed by a gun if you own one. I'm sure somewhere on the internet there's an anti-gun organization claiming that to be a fact, but its not.

As for Jesus not owning a gun... for one thing he was alive in a time when there were no guns. But besides that, not everyone is a christian so whatever Jesus would do doesn't matter to them. And, whatever the reason, I think a lot of hardcore christians own guns. conservatism tends to hand-in-hand with christianity. And conservatives tend to be very into owning guns.

And lastly, I think that criminals will end up having illegal guns no matter what. So making guns illegal will only leave the law-abiding people defenseless.

Also, I guess some people couold make the arument that guns are not only a weapon but also a sporting tool. And they want to be able to own guns so they can partake in their sports.

2007-09-17 15:48:11 · answer #1 · answered by egn18s 5 · 0 0

1 few gun murders in a no gun country...I can't argue with that logic.
2 why would a criminal give a rip about your laws
3 more crimes have been prevented by guns than committed with them
4 He did say "If you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one."
5 He didn't turn the other cheek with the charlatans he rousted out of the temple.
6 Defending yourself or your family with a gun is no more cowardly than with your fists
7 The 2nd was to insure we could defend ourselves from thieves, murderers but mostly to allow us to arm ourselves with the same weapons as used by a totalitarian government, bent on removing our other basic rights.

2007-09-18 11:27:31 · answer #2 · answered by RockHunter 7 · 0 1

ONE- there is no way the government could have the skill to discover each and all the weapons... plus, the only human beings turning their weapons in could be regulation-abiding voters, leaving all of them on the mercy of criminals, who could nonetheless have their weapons. 2-all criminals could nonetheless have their weapons... they at the instant are not stupid! 3- it is none of your business business enterprise no remember if i'm getting killed via a gun or not. 4 and 5- not everybody in this u . s . is a Christian, so this argument in common terms pertains to you or yet another Christian to paintings out in his or her heart. SIX- holding my relatives with a gun isn't cowardly, on the different, i will do despite it takes and so could you in case you have been in a situation the place it became them or you and yours. SEVEN- the 2nd exchange is an exchange till it is replaced, as a result that's the regulation. as far as concern is going, i'm greater petrified of our own government than i'm of a much off places government! greater beneficial- almost each and every chew of meat that I eat I kill myself... for my section, this is lots greater forthright and responsible than ordering the killing of caged animals with my purchases.

2016-12-17 03:56:26 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers