English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

OJ is at it again? He is in trouble with the law. Should he go to jail? I mean after all, it's not like he committed murder!
HA!!
I have said it before, and I'll say it again: "Once a thug, always a thug".
I think it is ridiculous to see it as a race issue, but yet again people keep throwing the race card out.

2007-09-17 14:22:47 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Other - News & Events

35 answers

OJ will get off on this one too. His lawyers are searching for any link between his accusers and the Brown and Goldman family.
I do not think a gun was involved. I heard the audio tape and not once did anyone yell put the gun down! Or made any references to a gun.

2007-09-17 14:26:47 · answer #1 · answered by fin73 4 · 0 0

OJ along with other celebs seem to think they are above the law and I think examples need to start being made or we are going to have chaos. Yes he should go to jail and be tried as a citizen not a black man or not a former celeb but for his crime. If the evidence is there and a jury sees him guilty then they need to convict him and he should serve the same amount of time that john doe would have served.

2007-09-17 14:54:03 · answer #2 · answered by Ladybugs77 6 · 0 0

Wow! What a amount and range of answers. Last I heard the Juice is in jail in Nevada. Good place for him. The only thing that is slightly troubling me is the recent release of his book. Maybe I am completely cynical, but it sure seems like a way to get the murder's name out there just in time for his book sale!

2007-09-17 14:33:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

OJ will go to jail in my opinion. He looks like he is happy under arrest, with the big smile, as if to say "At last I am getting what I deserved, the first time '.

2007-09-19 23:25:09 · answer #4 · answered by challenge_your_limit 2 · 0 0

Maybe not for the current crime, but if a gun and thugs were involved then yes he should go to jail.

As far as the murders go that is a definite "YES". The jury was clueless when it came to kid gloves. Having worn them I know when they get wet they shrink and get stiff. I don't care if you put mink oil on them they will never get to the size they were before they got wet.

2007-09-17 14:36:07 · answer #5 · answered by Aliz 6 · 0 0

After getting away with murder, I guess he thinks armed robbery is no big deal. Too bad Johnny Cochran is dead. Maybe this time he'll go to jail so no one ever has to see his smirking face again.

2007-09-18 15:08:17 · answer #6 · answered by Patti O 2 · 0 0

He should have already been in jail, so maybe he will go this time. And to be honest, even if he's not guilty this time he deserves to be there just for getting away with murder the last time.

2007-09-17 14:29:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Stick him and Blake in a jail together and make them listen to the theme for "Beretta" on loop for a week.

The survivor is released.

2007-09-17 14:29:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

YES, he should have been in jail from the 2 murders. But now he should definately go.

2007-09-17 14:27:05 · answer #9 · answered by ValleyR 7 · 1 1

Well, I think it was inevitable, it would be justice if he did go to jail. I bet his ex wife's family is pretty happy about this. But I wouldn't be surprised if he somehow "got" his way out of this one too...

2007-09-17 14:29:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers