English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

the city of rome started as a small state of its own, possibly refugees or transplants from another region. Rome was located in a great trade location and grew within reason. Through alliances and small battles Rome expanded with it's "king" well taken care of. At one point in time the early Roman empire was only the farm communities in Southern Italy. Then leaders beame wiser and made loyalties and pacts with other city states who were expanding in like manners until the city state of Roma was thought of as as a small country/empire.

So yes, it began as small tribes who found like minded tribes and agreed to certain prevlidges and in turn provided certain gifts. They were banded in much the same way as the Roman empire was famous for, certain regions retained their autonomy as long as they were paying into the "Union". Look at the EU, it is very Roman in concept. Then poof and voilla!, the leader became very specific in demands and crushed his opposition in a way that he became the first emperor and the idea that his empire expanded under his control meant he must have been doing something right. The power of the fist and might is right. Ding! Fries are done and Rome then had control over the whole of the Mediterranean the world at that time.

2007-09-17 18:27:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Livy, a Roman historian, tells the story of the founding of Rome. The Romans believed that their city started from refugees from the Trojan war, who fled to Rome, had a war with the local peoples ruled by a man named Latinus, and eventually blended to become one race. One of the younger refugees, the son of Aeneas, Ascanias, founded a second city, Alba Longa. Eventually, after there were many generations, Romulus (twin of Remus) was believed by the Romans to found a new city, Rome.

Plutarch has a different version, well several actually, but these are not as popular as Livy's version, which follow's Vergil's Aeneid pretty closely.

2007-09-17 14:35:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Objectively, mythology merely means thoughts approximately gods and how countless issues began, so it applies to all religions. many religions have lost all of their followers in time, and that's what befell to the classic Greek Olympic faith. Greece grow to be conquered by Macedonia and then Rome, and conquerors many times tension their religions upon the conquered peoples. Rome had a faith with maximum gods such as those of the Greeks, e.g. Zeus grow to be Jupiter, his spouse Hera grow to be Juno, etc. additionally they added some Persian and Egyptian gods to their pantheon. ultimately, the Roman Emperor Constantine grew to become a Christian and made that the state faith. the 1st answer is faulty to assert the Hebrew relgion is extra advantageous to the Greek one. He mentions ridiculous fantasies interior the Greek one, yet he ignores fantasies merely as ridiculous interior the Hebrew one. Which religions proceed to exist comprises some good fortune and public family members. No faith is something extra beneficial than fiction.

2016-10-18 22:52:21 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The Aeneid of Virgil is not of Greek origin though it picks up from the end of the Trojan war and goes forward to Carthage and then the beginning of Rome.Both Remus and Romulus have their parts in the Aeneid beginning in Book 1: Line 411.

2007-09-17 14:29:22 · answer #4 · answered by Terry 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers