i think the pharmacist overreacted.it is proper for the pharmacist to call your primary physician if you present multiple Rx's especially for controlled substances.
2007-09-17 14:09:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I believe medical professionals, even if they are from different facilities, can discuss whatever medical information about you that they need to in order to give proper treatment. In other words, it would be against the HIPPA Act for your doctor to tell the pharmacist something like, "Oh my gosh, do you know how many girls so and so is sleeping with? And now he has an STD", or for the pharmacist to tell your doctor something just as inappropriate and unnecessary. But in most cases, if your doctor is to treat you effectively, and especially if he/she is prescribing you something else, then the doc needs to know what else you're taking. Especially since if he/she prescribes you something, it may not be safe to take along with something else you are already taking.
2007-09-17 14:14:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Tigregrrl 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
HIPPA laws protect your records from "outside" sources. Pharmicists are considered part of the medical field and need to verify the prescriptions they fill, in the event two prescriptions may counteract and cause a patient harm.
The doctor may NOT tell the pharmacist what you originally saw the doctor for, nor may the doctor divulge any of your other medical history.
HIPPA laws are in place to protect your personal information, as well as your privacy. No one may access your records without your written permission. This also pertains to the changing of doctors. You will need to sign a form releasing the records at your former doctor's office to your current one.
You are also protected by doctor-patient privilege. This means your doctor may not discuss you or your health to anyone, outside of them being brought to court to testify.
The pharmacist was also corect in asking about the number of prescriptions you had and why two doctors for the same 'script. It is not normal for one person to have two prescriptions of the same type from two different doctors. It's not overly uncommon, but it does raise "red flags" to the pharmacist.
Hope this helps put your mind to rest
2007-09-17 14:13:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by bux_martinfan 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Pharmacists have their own code of professional conduct, just like doctors, and they can be severely discpilined for breaking it.
Think about what you are saying. If it comes to a pharmacist's attention that you are getting overmedicated by a prescription that is dangerous if overused, do you really expect him or her NOT to tell your doctor? It would be NEGLIGENT of the pharmacist to turn a blind eye.
There is a huge difference between what your pharmacist did (fully meeting a professional obligation to you), and for example telling the boys over a beer that you take viagara or something like that.
He or she was only doing a professional job.
If you have a problem with addiction to prescription medications, now is the time to speak up to your doctor. It will only get worse for you if you delay.
2007-09-17 14:15:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Pagan Dan 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
That is perfectly legal. Pharmacists and doctors are allowed to discuss all aspects of your medication treatment. Sometimes, you have to discuss medications prescribed by other doctors. The pharmacist cannot discuss your medications with the person in front of you in line, but your doctor, nurse, or any other health care professional, it is fine.
2007-09-18 06:05:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lea 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.and doctors and pharmacists discuss your records and medications.
Are you aware that getting different meds from different doctors without telling them what you are already taking is not only dangerous but stupid?
you should thank the pharmacist fo looking out for you.
2007-09-17 14:09:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by TedEx 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, HIPPA only covers individuals, not other healthcare providers or pharmacists. If the pharmacist suspects you are guilty of abusing medicine, it is not just their right, but their duty, to report it to the authorities; otherwise they could be charged as a co-conspirator.
2007-09-17 19:16:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by bottleblondemama 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It does not count in any respect what you or i think of in fact that the regulation says that ER drs might desire to handle existence threatening situations w/o regard to despite yet does not might desire to prescribe meds that interior the dr's ultimate judgement are no longer mandatory to maintain existence or interior the final interests of the affected person and definitely in each state i understand of if a dr does prescribe soreness meds to somebody who they have self belief is addicted they do run the prospect of no longer purely in nice condition yet censure by using the state med bd. i understand kidney stones harm such as you prefer you have been death in case you're no longer yet in fact until the guy has intense intense blood rigidity or cardiac issues soreness in and of itself isn't existence threatening and the final scientific care is to help the affected person bypass the stone or provide med to disolve it. through fact the reason being bumped off the soreness would be too. If a individual has very intense BP or heart issues they choose that on a scientific identity they create with them so the scientific institution team could be made conscious of it in the present day and takle perfect action.
2016-10-09 09:17:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by weigelt 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pharmasists don't have a 'no-tell' policy. They can call whoever you have a perscription from and confirm.
2007-09-17 14:07:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by Valerie 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
are pharmisists allowed to discuss your rx not knowing your condition with anyone elseincluding your spouse
2015-04-23 05:58:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Janet ann northam 1
·
0⤊
0⤋