English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

During the Palestanian uprising the killing of a 12 year old boy and the violent shooting of his unarmed father was caught on film and shown worldwide.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070917/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_boy_s_death



Now that France is calling for war in Iran, is it any surprise that Israel doesn't that un-edited video floating around as it is a public relations disaster for gaining support for the war?

2007-09-17 14:01:34 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

9 answers

Now, they want the video. If nothing was done wrong, than why do they want the video? Of course the truth will be denied, and a fake story will cover this up. Similar to other videos in the past. This is why Israel does not allow free footage by anyone there.

With actions such as this, it would seem that Israel 'wants' Palestinians to retaliate.

That is heartbreaking to hear how brutal the Israeli army can be to Palestinians. It's not any wonder that the media must feed violent images of Palestinians on a constant basis, to desensitize the public to the horror that has become every day life for them. The boy who was shot, was innocent, and Israel should be punished for the crime of murdering an innocent child.

2007-09-17 14:24:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

You are a fool. They (and many other groups) have been asking for its release FOR YEARS.
Releasing it doesn't mean Israel gets to destroy the original. It means everyone gets to see the original unedited version.

Israel's investigation concluded that the boy was either hit accidentally by Israel or more likely by the Palestinians themselves. A raw unedited version will go a long way to proving it one way or the other to those who disbelieve Israel (not that it would matter to them).

2007-09-18 13:19:46 · answer #2 · answered by BMCR 7 · 0 1

Gee, let's look at it realistically. A photographer in Viet Nam shoots a picture of GI's shooting a little kid and it gets front page. Why didn't they show the other six pictures the guy took of the little kid blowing up, because he had a live grenade taped to his back? Why, because it gives people like you a reason to complain. Same reason here. In my opinion.

2007-09-17 14:24:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

Israel and their evil zionist cons and neocons in the country are at it as usual LIE ,LIE, Terror, LIE , LIE Terror... and the cycle never ends!

2007-09-17 14:16:53 · answer #4 · answered by LEE DA 4 · 6 0

Did you actually read the artical or know ANYTHING about the incident?

Isreali Army is investigating claims that the entire incident was set up by French media thirsty to see some blood.

They aren't trying to get it so that no one can see it. That would be impossible since it was aired on TV and there are probably 100 copies of it floating around. Isreal just want the unedited copy to see what happened before and after the shooting.

You retard.

2007-09-17 14:10:02 · answer #5 · answered by Voice of Liberty 5 · 0 8

All their history is written this way

2007-09-17 19:09:19 · answer #6 · answered by Wise Heart 7 · 5 0

You mean that doctored film presented by the PLO that puported to show a 12 year old caught in a cross fire.

2007-09-17 14:29:26 · answer #7 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 0 7

They have nothing to do with each other, apples and oranges. Nice try.

2007-09-18 02:08:28 · answer #8 · answered by Bleh! 6 · 0 3

Surprised!! LOL ...not at all.

2007-09-17 14:15:15 · answer #9 · answered by Page 4 · 7 0

fedest.com, questions and answers