English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Hi can someone define the term intrinsic value for me and maybe give me and example? Thanx!

2007-09-17 13:50:55 · 3 answers · asked by briee89 4 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

3 answers

The idea that nature has intrinsic value is so controversial because the very idea of intrinsic value is controversial both politically and philosophically. This is one of the great chasms of philosophy into which green thinkers must throw themselves so as to assess the philosophical claim of intrinsic value if they want to employ it as a bridge on which to structure an ethics or ideology. If this controversy is not taken seriously greens will be in danger of acting in unethical ways or open to attack by groups sceptical about this notion. The notion of value is problematic in three different ways, whether value can be understood as a property (x has value), whether it is objective (or intrinsic) or subjective (or extrinsic) and how one can say what is valuable (evaluations). It is evident that intrinsic value cannot be measured as a property of nature. There is no empirical method to do this. To hold this notion, one must have some form of special awareness or explanation beyond the empirical. This problem is related to the issue as to whether value resides in the object (nature) or the subject (people) which is this essays main concern. With regards to what is valuable, things have value within the structure of people’s lives. This is not subjectivity because it could be an objective truth that something is valuable in a persons life. Philosophers have struggled with what the idea of intrinsic (or objective) value suggests, to avoid problems inherent in the subjective position (namely, relativism) and to provide a firm, moral foundation. Though I have the choice to describe the objectivist position as one side of the debate, I think it would be more interesting to elaborate the subjectivist position as a critique of the idea; but for reasons of space I cannot undertake both tasks.

2007-09-17 14:05:32 · answer #1 · answered by Hot Coco Puff 7 · 8 0

you're taking leaps of religion by brushing off the two exterior brokers and intrinsic value in the previous you even start up. this is one element again to such conclusions as a results of following a approach of reasonig, this is yet another to easily start up with them as assumptions. For all all of us comprehend, there may well be some intrinsic value, possibly this is purely the aptitude that exists- as for deities sacrifices i've got not met any, yet having pronounced that my firsthand know-how of the universe is limited to small components of this planet, possibly they're busy of their workshops around the cosmos, in the event that they exist in any respect. possibly our DNA holds the significant to many mysteries, and doubtless no longer. The argument is additionally made that existence is so base/elementary/uniform while you evaluate that's what works in this universe. Unecessary complexity which isn't adaptive purely does not survive and this is the reason we see what we see. Is there value in questioning the question?

2016-10-04 22:14:52 · answer #2 · answered by pantano 4 · 0 0

The intrinsic theory holds that good is inherent in certain things or actions, regardless of the consequences and that good is independent of man's consciousness.

Hitler is an example of this theory. He believed what he was doing was intrinsically good, no matter the consequences to the millions killed. Hitler regarded wholesale slaughter of Jews as his moral duty in service of higher good.

2007-09-17 14:52:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers